Hospital bed capacity and usage across secondary healthcare providers in England during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive analysis

Author:

Mateen Bilal AkhterORCID,Wilde HarrisonORCID,Dennis John MORCID,Duncan Andrew,Thomas Nick,McGovern Andrew,Denaxas SpirosORCID,Keeling Matt,Vollmer Sebastian

Abstract

ObjectiveIn this study, we describe the pattern of bed occupancy across England during the peak of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignDescriptive survey.SettingAll non-specialist secondary care providers in England from 27 March27to 5 June 2020.ParticipantsAcute (non-specialist) trusts with a type 1 (ie, 24 hours/day, consultant-led) accident and emergency department (n=125), Nightingale (field) hospitals (n=7) and independent sector secondary care providers (n=195).Main outcome measuresTwo thresholds for ‘safe occupancy’ were used: 85% as per the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and 92% as per NHS Improvement.ResultsAt peak availability, there were 2711 additional beds compatible with mechanical ventilation across England, reflecting a 53% increase in capacity, and occupancy never exceeded 62%. A consequence of the repurposing of beds meant that at the trough there were 8.7% (8508) fewer general and acute beds across England, but occupancy never exceeded 72%. The closest to full occupancy of general and acute bed (surge) capacity that any trust in England reached was 99.8% . For beds compatible with mechanical ventilation there were 326 trust-days (3.7%) spent above 85% of surge capacity and 154 trust-days (1.8%) spent above 92%. 23 trusts spent a cumulative 81 days at 100% saturation of their surge ventilator bed capacity (median number of days per trust=1, range: 1–17). However, only three sustainability and transformation partnerships (aggregates of geographically co-located trusts) reached 100% saturation of their mechanical ventilation beds.ConclusionsThroughout the first wave of the pandemic, an adequate supply of all bed types existed at a national level. However, due to an unequal distribution of bed utilisation, many trusts spent a significant period operating above ‘safe-occupancy’ thresholds despite substantial capacity in geographically co-located trusts, a key operational issue to address in preparing for future waves.

Funder

UK Research and Innovation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. The King’s Fund . NHS Hospital bed numbers, 2020. Available: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/nhs-hospital-bed-numbers [Accessed 21 June 2020].

2. The hospital bed: on its way out?

3. The Health Foundation . The NHS this winter: looking beneath the National view | the health Foundation. Available: https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/blogs/the-nhs-this-winter-looking-beneath-the-national-view [Accessed 21 Jun 2020].

4. British Medical Association . Bed occupancy in the NHS - Pressures - BMA. The British Medical Association is the trade union and professional body for doctors in the UK, 2020. Available: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/pressures/bed-occupancy-in-the-nhs [Accessed 21 Jun 2020].

5. Dynamics of bed use in accommodating emergency admissions: stochastic simulation model

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3