Shared decision-making in the management of pulmonary nodules: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies

Author:

Yuan JingminORCID,Xu Fenglin,Sun Yan,Ren Hui,Chen Mingwei,Feng Sifang

Abstract

ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of pulmonary nodules.DesignSystematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.Data sourceStudies published in English or Chinese up to April 2022 were extracted from nine databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed Data.Eligibility criteriaStudies were eligible if patients or healthcare providers are faced with pulmonary nodule management options or the interventions or experiences were focused on the patient–healthcare provider relationship or health education to make, increase or support shared decisions. All types of studies were included, including quantitative and qualitative studies. Grey literature and literature that had not been peer reviewed were excluded. Poster abstracts and non-empirical publications such as editorials, letters, opinion papers and review articles were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute’s critical appraisal tools, and extracted data from included studies. Thematic syntheses were used to identify prominent themes emerging from the data.ResultsA total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were conducted in USA. These included six qualitative studies and six quantitative studies (including both survey and quasi-experimental designs). Three major themes with specific subthemes emerged: (1) Opportunity (uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules, willingness to participate in decision-making); (2) Ability (patient’s lack of knowledge, physician’s experience); and (3) Different worldview (misconception, distress among patients, preference for diagnosis and treatment).ConclusionsUncertainty in the management of pulmonary nodules is the opportunity to implement SDM. Patients’ lack of knowledge, distress, and misunderstandings between healthcare providers and patients are both the main obstacles and the causes of the application of SDM.

Publisher

BMJ

Reference43 articles.

1. What is a lung Nodule?;Slatore;Am J Respir Crit Care Med,2016

2. Patient-centered, guideline-concordant discussion and management of pulmonary nodules;Wiener;Chest,2020

3. International Agency for Research on Cancer . Thoracic tumors. Lyon Cedex: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2021.

4. Introduction to 2021 WHO classification of Thoracic tumors;Tsao;J Thorac Oncol,2022

5. Pulmonary nodules: A small problem for many, severe distress for some, and how to communicate about it;Slatore;Chest,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3