‘Maze’ not pathway: focus group exploration of patients’ and public experiences of the UK NHS elective total joint arthroplasty pathway

Author:

Jasim SarahORCID,Aspinal FionaORCID,Mehta Raj,Ledger Jean,Raine Rosalind,Fulop Naomi JORCID,Barratt HelenORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore patient and public perceptions of planned improvements to the National Health Service (NHS) total joint arthroplasty (TJA) pathway.DesignThree qualitative focus groups undertaken March–May 2018, as part of a mixed-methods evaluation of Getting It Right First Time. Transcripts were subject to framework analysis to identify thematic content between October 2018 and October 2021.SettingElective TJA surgery in the English NHS.ParticipantsTwo focus groups including patients who had undergone TJA in the previous 2 years (group 1: n=5; group 2: n=4) and the other individuals who had not but were aged 60+ (group 3: n=5). Participants were recruited via community groups and patient panels.ResultsFourteen individuals took part in the focus groups; all were aged over 60; seven (50%) were female and nine (64%) had undergone TJA surgery. Participants’ perspectives were categorised into themes and mapped onto stages of the TJA pathway. Although perioperative care is often the focus of improvement efforts, participants argued that the patient journey begins before individuals present to primary care. Participants had concerns about other aspects of the pathway, such as obtaining a surgical referral, with prereferral interventions aimed at potentially avoiding the need for surgery (ie, physiotherapy) being perceived as a mechanism to restrict access to secondary care. Patient experience was also conceptualised as a ‘maze’, rather than the logical, sequential process set out in clinical guidelines; exacerbated by a lack of information, knowledge and power imbalances.ConclusionThe linear conceptualisation of the TJA pathway is at odds with patient experience. Improvement programmes focused on perioperative care fail to consider patient concerns and priorities. Patients should be directly involved in improvement programmes, to ensure that patient experience is optimised, as well as informing related processes and important outcomes of care.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research (Applied Research Collaboration

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. National Institute of clinical excellence (NICE) hip, knee and shoulder joint replacement guideline scope. 2018. Available: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10084/documents/draft-scope [Accessed 18 Nov 2021].

2. Briggs T . Getting it Right First Time: improving the quality of orthopaedic care within the National Health Service in England, 2012. London, United Kingdom: British Orthopaedic Association, 2012.

3. OECD . Hip and knee replacement. health at a glance [OECD Indicators]. 2019. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/2fc83b9a-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/2fc83b9a-en [Accessed 18 Nov 2021].

4. Marsh M , Newman S . Trends and developments in hip and knee arthroplasty technology. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng 2021;8:2055668320952043. doi:10.1177/2055668320952043

5. Global perspectives on arthroplasty of hip and knee joints;Abdelaal;Orthop Clin North Am,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3