Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications
Author:
Behrens Angelika, Kreuzmayr Anton, Manner Hendrik, Koop Herbert, Lorenz Albrecht, Schaefer Claus, Plauth Mathais, Jetschmann Jens-Uwe, von Tirpitz Christian, Ewald Marcus, Sackmann Michael, Renner Wanja, Krüger Martin, Schwab Dieter, Hoffmann Werner, Engelke Olaf, Pech Oliver, Kullmann Frank, Pampuch Sonja, Lenfers Berthold, Weickert Uwe, Schilling Dieter, Boehm Stephan, Beckebaum Susanne, Cicinnati Vito, Erckenbrecht Joachim F, Dumoulin Franz LudwigORCID, Benz Claus, Rabenstein Thomas, Haltern Georg, Balsliemke Martin, de Mas Christian, Kleber Gerhard, Pehl Christian, Vogt Christoph, Kiesslich Ralf, Fischbach Wolfgang, Koop Irmtraut, Kuehne Jens, Breidert Matthias, Sass Nils Lennart, May Andrea, Friedrich Christian, Veitt Ronni, Porschen Rainer, Ellrichmann Mark, Arlt AlexanderORCID, Schmitt Wolfgang, Dollhopf Markus, Schmidbaur Werner, Dignass Axel, Schmitz Volker, Labenz J, Kaiser Gernot, Krannich AlexanderORCID, Barteska Nico, Ell Christian
Abstract
ObjectivesSedation has been established for GI endoscopic procedures in most countries, but it is also associated with an added risk of complications. Reported complication rates are variable due to different study methodologies and often limited sample size.DesignsAcute sedation-associated complications were prospectively recorded in an electronic endoscopy documentation in 39 study centres between December 2011 and August 2014 (median inclusion period 24 months). The sedation regimen was decided by each study centre.ResultsA total of 368 206 endoscopies was recorded; 11% without sedation. Propofol was the dominant drug used (62% only, 22.5% in combination with midazolam). Of the sedated patients, 38 (0.01%) suffered a major complication, and overall mortality was 0.005% (n=15); minor complications occurred in 0.3%. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for all complications: American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR 2.29) and type and duration of endoscopy. Of the sedation regimens, propofol monosedation had the lowest rate (OR 0.75) compared with midazolam (reference) and combinations (OR 1.0–1.5). Compared with primary care hospitals, tertiary referral centres had higher complication rates (OR 1.61). Notably, compared with sedation by a two-person endoscopy team (endoscopist/assistant; 53.5% of all procedures), adding another person for sedation (nurse, physician) was associated with higher complication rates (ORs 1.40–4.46), probably due to higher complexity of procedures not evident in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThis large multicentre registry study confirmed that severe acute sedation-related complications are rare during GI endoscopy with a very low mortality. The data are useful for planning risk factor-adapted sedation management to further prevent sedation-associated complications in selected patients.Trial registration numberDRKS00007768; Pre-results.
Cited by
74 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|