Acute sedation-associated complications in GI endoscopy (ProSed 2 Study): results from the prospective multicentre electronic registry of sedation-associated complications

Author:

Behrens Angelika,Kreuzmayr Anton,Manner Hendrik,Koop Herbert,Lorenz Albrecht,Schaefer Claus,Plauth Mathais,Jetschmann Jens-Uwe,von Tirpitz Christian,Ewald Marcus,Sackmann Michael,Renner Wanja,Krüger Martin,Schwab Dieter,Hoffmann Werner,Engelke Olaf,Pech Oliver,Kullmann Frank,Pampuch Sonja,Lenfers Berthold,Weickert Uwe,Schilling Dieter,Boehm Stephan,Beckebaum Susanne,Cicinnati Vito,Erckenbrecht Joachim F,Dumoulin Franz LudwigORCID,Benz Claus,Rabenstein Thomas,Haltern Georg,Balsliemke Martin,de Mas Christian,Kleber Gerhard,Pehl Christian,Vogt Christoph,Kiesslich Ralf,Fischbach Wolfgang,Koop Irmtraut,Kuehne Jens,Breidert Matthias,Sass Nils Lennart,May Andrea,Friedrich Christian,Veitt Ronni,Porschen Rainer,Ellrichmann Mark,Arlt AlexanderORCID,Schmitt Wolfgang,Dollhopf Markus,Schmidbaur Werner,Dignass Axel,Schmitz Volker,Labenz J,Kaiser Gernot,Krannich AlexanderORCID,Barteska Nico,Ell Christian

Abstract

ObjectivesSedation has been established for GI endoscopic procedures in most countries, but it is also associated with an added risk of complications. Reported complication rates are variable due to different study methodologies and often limited sample size.DesignsAcute sedation-associated complications were prospectively recorded in an electronic endoscopy documentation in 39 study centres between December 2011 and August 2014 (median inclusion period 24 months). The sedation regimen was decided by each study centre.ResultsA total of 368 206 endoscopies was recorded; 11% without sedation. Propofol was the dominant drug used (62% only, 22.5% in combination with midazolam). Of the sedated patients, 38 (0.01%) suffered a major complication, and overall mortality was 0.005% (n=15); minor complications occurred in 0.3%. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent risk factors for all complications: American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 (OR 2.29) and type and duration of endoscopy. Of the sedation regimens, propofol monosedation had the lowest rate (OR 0.75) compared with midazolam (reference) and combinations (OR 1.0–1.5). Compared with primary care hospitals, tertiary referral centres had higher complication rates (OR 1.61). Notably, compared with sedation by a two-person endoscopy team (endoscopist/assistant; 53.5% of all procedures), adding another person for sedation (nurse, physician) was associated with higher complication rates (ORs 1.40–4.46), probably due to higher complexity of procedures not evident in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThis large multicentre registry study confirmed that severe acute sedation-related complications are rare during GI endoscopy with a very low mortality. The data are useful for planning risk factor-adapted sedation management to further prevent sedation-associated complications in selected patients.Trial registration numberDRKS00007768; Pre-results.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

Gastroenterology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3