Abstract
Despite increased amounts of research, most of the evidence that supports treatment of newborns in the delivery room is rated ‘low’ rather than ‘high’ quality. This assessment stems largely from a lack of evidence from clinical trials. When trials have been performed, the evidence has often been downgraded due to enrolment of small or poorly representative samples, and for lack of blinding of caregivers and outcome assessors. Delivery room trials present particular challenges when obtaining consent, enrolling participants, taking measures to limit bias and identifying appropriate outcome measures. We hope our suggestions as to how future delivery room trials could be more pragmatic will inform the design of large studies that are necessary to allow clinical practice to evolve.
Subject
Obstetrics and Gynecology,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference28 articles.
1. Pinching, electrocution, ravens' beaks, and positive pressure ventilation: a brief history of neonatal resuscitation
2. A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant.
3. Dawes GS . Foetal and neonatal physiology: a comparative study of the changes at birth. Chicago IL, USA: Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, 1968.
4. ed KJ . Textbook of neonatal resuscitation. Elk Grove IL, USA: American Heart Association/American Academy of Pediatrics, 1987.
5. Resuscitation Council UK . Newborn life support: resuscitation at birth. London UK, 2001.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献