Visual Assessment of Phony Peach Disease: Evaluating Rater Accuracy and Reliability

Author:

Johnson Kendall A.1,Brannen Phillip2,Chen Chunxian3,Bock Clive4

Affiliation:

1. University of Georgia, 1355, Plant Pathology, 150 Westpark Drive, apt 301, Athens, Georgia, United States, 30606;

2. 2105 Miller Plant SciencesAthens, United States, 30602;

3. Byron, Georgia, United States;

4. USDA-ARS-USHRL, Plant Pathology, 2001 South Rock Rd, Ft Pierce, Florida, United States, 34945, ;

Abstract

Phony peach disease (PPD), found predominantly in central and southern Georgia is a re-emerging disease caused by Xylella fastidiosa (Xf) subsp. multiplex. Accurate detection and rapid removal of symptomatic trees are crucial to effective disease management. Currently, peach producers rely solely on visual identification of symptoms to confirm PPD, which can be ambiguous if early in development. We compared visual assessment to quantitative PCR (qPCR) for detecting Xf in ‘Julyprince’ in 2019 and 2020 (JP2019 and JP2020) and in 2020 in ‘Scarletprince’ (SP2020). With no prior knowledge of qPCR results, all trees in each orchard were assessed by a cohort of 5 experienced and 5 inexperienced raters in the morning and afternoon. Visual identification accuracy of PPD was variable, but experienced raters were more accurate when identifying PPD trees. In JP2019, mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.882 and 0.805, respectively. For JP2020 mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.914 and 0.816, respectively, and for SP2020 mean rater accuracy for experienced and inexperienced raters was 0.898 and 0.807, respectively. All raters had false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) observations, although, experienced raters had significantly lower FN rates compared to the inexperienced group. Almost all raters overestimated the incidence of PPD in the orchards. Reliability of visual assessments was demonstrated as moderate to good, regardless of experience. Further research is needed to develop accurate and reliable methods of detection to aid management of PPD as both FPs and FNs are costly to peach production.

Publisher

Scientific Societies

Subject

Plant Science,Agronomy and Crop Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3