Author:
Yin Lanlan,Pettengill James B.
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Much has been written about the utility of genomic databases to public health. Within food safety these databases contain data from two types of isolates—those from patients (i.e., clinical) and those from non-clinical sources (e.g., a food manufacturing environment). A genetic match between isolates from these sources represents a signal of interest. We investigate the match rate within three large genomic databases (Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella) and the smaller Cronobacter database; the databases are part of the Pathogen Detection project at NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information).
Results
Currently, the match rate of clinical isolates to non-clinical isolates is 33% for L. monocytogenes, 46% for Salmonella, and 7% for E. coli. These match rates are associated with several database features including the diversity of the organism, the database size, and the proportion of non-clinical BioSamples. Modeling match rate via logistic regression showed relatively good performance. Our prediction model illustrates the importance of populating databases with non-clinical isolates to better identify a match for clinical samples. Such information should help public health officials prioritize surveillance strategies and show the critical need to populate fledgling databases (e.g., Cronobacter sakazakii).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference10 articles.
1. Carter LL, Yu MA, Sacks JA, Barnadas C, Pereyaslov D, Cognat S, Briand S, Ryan MJ, Samaan G. Global genomic surveillance strategy for pathogens with pandemic and epidemic potential 2022–2032. Bull World Health Organ. 2022;100(4):239–239a.
2. Black A, MacCannell DR, Sibley TR, Bedford T. Ten recommendations for supporting open pathogen genomic analysis in public health. Nat Med. 2020;26(6):832–41.
3. Helmy M, Awad M, Mosa KA. Limited resources of genome sequencing in developing countries: challenges and solutions. Appl Transl Genom. 2016;9:15–9.
4. Atutornu J, Milne R, Costa A, Patch C, Middleton A. Towards equitable and trustworthy genomics research. EBioMedicine. 2022;76: 103879.
5. Sayers EW, Bolton EE, Brister JR, Canese K, Chan J, Comeau DC, Farrell CM, Feldgarden M, Fine AM, Funk K, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1032.