Author:
Namdar Zahra Mehdipour,Omidifar Navid,Arasteh Peyman,Akrami Majid,Tahmasebi Sedigheh,Nobandegani Aida Salehi,Sedighi Sogol,Zangouri Vahid,Talei Abdolrasoul
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Frozen section (FS) pathology has multiple limitations, and different institutions report variable experiences with the use of FS for diagnosis of tumor involvement. We aimed to compare the FS accuracy with that of permanent pathology (gold standard) regarding marginal involvement and lymph node status using data from the largest breast cancer registry in Iran.
Methods
In this retrospective study, women who had both FS and permanent pathology reports were included. The two pathology reports were cross compared with regard to the involvement of tumor margins and sentinel lymph nodes.
Results
Overall, 2786 patients entered the study. Mean age of patients was 48.96±11.44 years. A total of 1742 margins were analyzed. Accordingly, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of FS pathology for detection of involvement of involved margins were 78.49%, 97.63%, 65.1%, and 98.7%, respectively. The accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) for FS pathology were 96.61% and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.64–0.831), respectively.
A total of 1702 sentinel lymph node biopsies were assessed. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV, of FS pathology for detection of lymph node involvement, were 87.1%, 98%, 95.5%, and 93.3%, respectively. Accuracy and AUC of FS for diagnosis of involved lymph nodes were 94.1% and 0.926 (95% CI: 0.909–0.942), respectively.
Conclusion
Frozen pathology is a suitable method for identifying involved sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer, but this method has a less than optimum efficacy for detecting and confirming marginal involvement.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference23 articles.
1. Shrivastava S, Shrivastava PS, Ramasamy J. Self breast examination: a tool for early diagnosis of breast cancer. Am J Public Health Res. 2013;1(6):135–9. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajphr-1-6-2.
2. GCO. World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home. Accessed 24 Aug 2021.
3. Jaafar H. Intra-operative frozen section consultation: concepts, applications and limitations. Malaysian J Med Sci. 2006;13(1):4–12.
4. Farouk O, Senbel A, Shetiwy M, Attia E, Abdallah A, El-Damshety O, et al. The effectiveness of intraoperative frozen section analysis of safety margins in breast conserving surgery and the role of surgeon in decreasing the rate of positive margins. Surg Sci. 2017;8(12):499–509.
5. Miyamoto H. Clinical benefits of frozen section assessment during urological surgery: does it contribute to improving surgical margin status and patient outcomes as previously thought? Int J Urol. 2017;24(1):25–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13247.