Innovation in humanitarian assistance—a systematic literature review

Author:

Bruder MaximilianORCID,Baar Thomas

Abstract

AbstractThe promise of innovation in humanitarian contexts has generated an expanding literature, from academics as well as practitioners. However, the field has become characterised by conceptual ambiguity and insular approaches, inhibiting the integration of findings and best practices. Therefore, this paper aims to identify the key concepts, definitions, and themes in humanitarian innovation (HI) research by applying a systematic literature review and content analysis. Based on data from 301 publications, we analyse scholarly and practitioner articles addressing the topic of humanitarian innovation. Our analysis suggests that efforts to reform the humanitarian system by leveraging innovation have been primarily ad hoc, fragmented, and serving miscellaneous separate objectives. This results in the implementation of incremental improvements, rather than transformative change throughout the sector. To bridge the gap between the various conceptualisations of HI, we propose a conceptual framework that provides a system perspective on HI, which includes the institutions, actors, contextual factors, and outputs of the system. The implications of our finding for further research and policy are discussed as well.Points for practitioners• Ensure active participation and inclusion of affected populations in innovation agendas and processes.• Strengthen collaborative efforts among actors (donors, practitioners, private sector, intermediaries, NGOs) in humanitarian sector to increase coordination, knowledge exchange, and bundling of resources for innovation.• Facilitate evidence-based approaches and data-driven decision-making, for the operationalisation of appropriate innovations.• Increase the quality and quantity of funding going to innovation actors, and steer funding towards innovations explicitly catering to the needs of affected populations. Graphical Abstract

Funder

Ministerie van Buitenlandse Zaken

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference132 articles.

1. Australian Aid (2016) Humanitarian strategy. Australian Government. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/dfat-humanitarian-strategy.pdf

2. ALNAP (2015) Supporting disabled people in emergencies: motivation’s appropriate and affordable wheelchairs - World. In ReliefWeb. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/supporting-disabled-people-emergencies-motivation-s-appropriate-and-affordable

3. ALNAP (2018) The State of the Humanitarian System (ALNAP Study). ALNAP/ODI. https://www.alnap.org/help-library/the-state-of-the-humanitarian-system-2018-full-report

4. Bahadur A, Doczi J (2016) Unlocking resilience through autonomous innovation. Overseas Development Institute. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/10245.pdf

5. Balestra G (2019) The misfit of innovation [UNHCR Innovation Service]. https://medium.com/unhcr-innovation-service/the-misfit-of-innovation-f86ac0bf1a9b

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3