Abstract
AbstractPerennial forage plants are efficient utilizers of solar radiation and nutrients so that there is a lot of scope to increase the production of green biomass in many areas. Currently, grasses are mainly used as feeds for ruminants and equines, but there could be higher added value use for several components of the green biomass. Interest in green biorefining has risen recently motivated by the increased sustainability pressures and need to break the reliance on fossil fuels. Novel products derived from grass, such as paper and packaging, nanofibers, animal bedding, novel protein feeds, extracted proteins, biochemicals, nutraceuticals, bioactive compounds, biogas and biochar could create new sustainable business opportunities in rural areas. Most green biorefinery concepts focus on using fresh green biomass as the feedstock, but preservation of it by ensiling would provide several benefits such as all-year-around availability of the feedstock and increased stability of the press juice and press cake. The major difference between fresh and ensiled grass is the conversion of water soluble carbohydrates into fermentation end products, mainly lactic and acetic acids, that lower the pH of the silage so that it becomes stable in anaerobic conditions. This has some important consequences on the processability and quality of products, which are partly positive and partly negative, e.g., degradation of protein into peptides, amino acids and ammonia. These aspects are discussed in this review.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Maa- ja MetsätalousministeriÖ
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Jørgensen U, Jensen SK, Ambye-Jensen M. Coupling the benefits of grassland crops and green biorefining to produce protein, materials and services for the green transition. Grass Forage Sci. 2022;77(4):295–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12594.
2. Luke. Official variety trial results. Natural resources institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland. https://px.luke.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/maatalous. Accessed 5 Sept 2023.
3. Weissbach F. Prediction of biogas production potential of silages. XVth International Silage Conference, Madison, WI, USA. U.S. Dairy Forage Res Center and Univ Wisconsin-Madison. 2009. p. 189–90. https://www.isc2021.cn/uploads/20210927/15thISC.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2023.
4. McEniry J, Allen E, Murphy JD, O’Kiely P. Grass for biogas production. The impact of silage fermentation characteristics on methane yield in two contrasting biomethane potential test systems. Renew Energ. 2014;63:524–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.052.
5. Grundman P, Adamseged ME, Ding Z, Orozco R, Park H, Germer S, et al. White paper for grassland opportunities – discussion document. 2022. https://www.go-grass.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/2023_01_23_GO-GRASS-White-Paper-Draft.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2023.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献