Patient knowledge of surgical informed consent and shared decision-making process among surgical patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Mihiretu Mengistu Mera,Bekele Ermias,Ayele Kokeb,Asmare Lakew,Bayou Fekade Demeke,Arefaynie Mastewal,Tsega Yawkal,Endawkie Abel,Kebede Shimels Derso,Kebede Natnael

Abstract

Abstract Background Informed consent is one of the safeguarding of the patient in medical practice at different standards such as ethical, legal, and administrative purposes. Patient knowledge and perception of informed consent are one of the priority concerns in surgical procedures. Patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent increased patient satisfaction, feeling high power on their determination, and accountability for the management, and facilitated positive treatment outcomes. Despite this, in Ethiopia, there are small-scale primary studies with inconsistent and inconclusive findings. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis study estimated the pooled prevalence of patient knowledge and perception of informed consent and its determinants in Ethiopia. Methods We searched major databases such as PubMed, Hinary, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, African Journal Online (AJO), Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar, google, and reference lists. Besides this, University databases in the country were also searched from August 20, 2023, until September 30, 2023,. All published and unpublished studies that report the prevalence of patient knowledge and perception toward informed consent and its associated factors were included. All studies reported in English were included. Studies conducted between January 01, 2015 to September 30, 2023 were included. There are three outcome measurements pooled level of patient knowledge towards informed consent, pooled level of patient perception towards informed consent, and pooled effect that affects patient knowledge of informed consent. Three reviewers (MMM, NK, and YT) independently screened the articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria to avoid the risk of bias. The studies’ quality was appraised using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) version. Results The pooled prevalence of appropriate patient knowledge and perception towards informed consent was 32% (95% CI: 21, 43) and 40% (95% CI: 16, 65) respectively. Having formal education 2.69 (95% CI: 1.18, 6.15) and having a history of signed informed consent before 3.65 (95% CI:1.02,13.11) had a statistically significant association with good patient knowledge towards informed consent. Conclusion The appropriate patient knowledge and perception of informed consent in Ethiopia is low. Formal education and history of signed informed consent were positive factors for appropriate patient knowledge of informed consent in Ethiopia. Physicians, policymakers, and health facility managers should focus on patients without prior experience with signed informed consent and not have formal education to improve patient knowledge towards informed consent. The protocol was registered at Prospero with number CRD42023445409 and is available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Reference38 articles.

1. Shoemaker SJ, Brach C, Edwards A, Chitavi SO, Thomas R, Wasserman M. Opportunities to improve informed consent with AHRQ training modules. Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018;44(6):343–52.

2. OKUKPON OP. 2015. Assessment of informed consent in selected health facilities in Benin city, Edo state. Public Health.

3. Galal YS. Knowledge, practice, and perception towards the informed consent process among physicians and patients in General Surgical Departments at Cairo University Hospitals. Egypt J Commun Med. 2016;34(2):1–17.

4. Knifed E, Lipsman N, Mason W, Bernstein M. Patients’ perception of the informed consent process for neurooncological clinical trials. Neurooncology. 2008;10(3):348–54.

5. Wismayer R. Study about Informed Consent for Surgical Care in East Africa. New Horizons in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 2022;3:210–5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3