METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII

Author:

Kocak BurakORCID,Akinci D’Antonoli TugbaORCID,Mercaldo NathanielORCID,Alberich-Bayarri AngelORCID,Baessler BettinaORCID,Ambrosini IlariaORCID,Andreychenko Anna E.ORCID,Bakas SpyridonORCID,Beets-Tan Regina G. H.ORCID,Bressem KenoORCID,Buvat IreneORCID,Cannella RobertoORCID,Cappellini Luca AlessandroORCID,Cavallo Armando UgoORCID,Chepelev Leonid L.ORCID,Chu Linda Chi HangORCID,Demircioglu AydinORCID,deSouza Nandita M.ORCID,Dietzel MatthiasORCID,Fanni Salvatore ClaudioORCID,Fedorov AndreyORCID,Fournier Laure S.ORCID,Giannini ValentinaORCID,Girometti RossanoORCID,Groot Lipman Kevin B. W.ORCID,Kalarakis GeorgiosORCID,Kelly Brendan S.ORCID,Klontzas Michail E.ORCID,Koh Dow-MuORCID,Kotter ElmarORCID,Lee Ho YunORCID,Maas MarioORCID,Marti-Bonmati LuisORCID,Müller HenningORCID,Obuchowski NancyORCID,Orlhac FannyORCID,Papanikolaou NikolaosORCID,Petrash EkaterinaORCID,Pfaehler ElisabethORCID,Pinto dos Santos DanielORCID,Ponsiglione AndreaORCID,Sabater SebastiàORCID,Sardanelli FrancescoORCID,Seeböck PhilippORCID,Sijtsema Nanna M.ORCID,Stanzione ArnaldoORCID,Traverso AlbertoORCID,Ugga LorenzoORCID,Vallières MartinORCID,van Dijk Lisanne V.ORCID,van Griethuysen Joost J. M.ORCID,van Hamersvelt Robbert W.ORCID,van Ooijen PeterORCID,Vernuccio FedericaORCID,Wang AlanORCID,Williams StuartORCID,Witowski JanORCID,Zhang ZhongyiORCID,Zwanenburg AlexORCID,Cuocolo RenatoORCID

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To propose a new quality scoring tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), to assess and improve research quality of radiomics studies. Methods We conducted an online modified Delphi study with a group of international experts. It was performed in three consecutive stages: Stage#1, item preparation; Stage#2, panel discussion among EuSoMII Auditing Group members to identify the items to be voted; and Stage#3, four rounds of the modified Delphi exercise by panelists to determine the items eligible for the METRICS and their weights. The consensus threshold was 75%. Based on the median ranks derived from expert panel opinion and their rank-sum based conversion to importance scores, the category and item weights were calculated. Result In total, 59 panelists from 19 countries participated in selection and ranking of the items and categories. Final METRICS tool included 30 items within 9 categories. According to their weights, the categories were in descending order of importance: study design, imaging data, image processing and feature extraction, metrics and comparison, testing, feature processing, preparation for modeling, segmentation, and open science. A web application and a repository were developed to streamline the calculation of the METRICS score and to collect feedback from the radiomics community. Conclusion In this work, we developed a scoring tool for assessing the methodological quality of the radiomics research, with a large international panel and a modified Delphi protocol. With its conditional format to cover methodological variations, it provides a well-constructed framework for the key methodological concepts to assess the quality of radiomic research papers. Critical relevance statement A quality assessment tool, METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS), is made available by a large group of international domain experts, with transparent methodology, aiming at evaluating and improving research quality in radiomics and machine learning. Key points • A methodological scoring tool, METRICS, was developed for assessing the quality of radiomics research, with a large international expert panel and a modified Delphi protocol. • The proposed scoring tool presents expert opinion-based importance weights of categories and items with a transparent methodology for the first time. • METRICS accounts for varying use cases, from handcrafted radiomics to entirely deep learning-based pipelines. • A web application has been developed to help with the calculation of the METRICS score (https://metricsscore.github.io/metrics/METRICS.html) and a repository created to collect feedback from the radiomics community (https://github.com/metricsscore/metrics). Graphical Abstract

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3