Androgen receptor-mediated pharmacogenomic expression quantitative trait loci: implications for breast cancer response to AR-targeting therapy
-
Published:2024-07-04
Issue:1
Volume:26
Page:
-
ISSN:1465-542X
-
Container-title:Breast Cancer Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Breast Cancer Res
Author:
Gao Huanyao,Wei Lixuan,Indulkar Shreya,Nguyen Thanh Thanh. L.,Liu Duan,Ho Ming-Fen,Zhang Cheng,Li Hu,Weinshilboum Richard M.,Ingle James N.,Wang Liewei
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endocrine therapy is the most important treatment modality of breast cancer patients whose tumors express the estrogen receptor α (ERα). The androgen receptor (AR) is also expressed in the vast majority (80–90%) of ERα-positive tumors. AR-targeting drugs are not used in clinical practice, but have been evaluated in multiple trials and preclinical studies.
Methods
We performed a genome-wide study to identify hormone/drug-induced single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype - dependent gene-expression, known as PGx-eQTL, mediated by either an AR agonist (dihydrotestosterone) or a partial antagonist (enzalutamide), utilizing a previously well characterized lymphoblastic cell line panel. The association of the identified SNPs-gene pairs with breast cancer phenotypes were then examined using three genome-wide association (GWAS) studies that we have published and other studies from the GWAS catalog.
Results
We identified 13 DHT-mediated PGx-eQTL loci and 23 Enz-mediated PGx-eQTL loci that were associated with breast cancer outcomes post ER antagonist or aromatase inhibitors (AI) treatment, or with pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of AIs. An additional 30 loci were found to be associated with cancer risk and sex-hormone binding globulin levels. The top loci involved the genes IDH2 and TMEM9, the expression of which were suppressed by DHT in a PGx-eQTL SNP genotype-dependent manner. Both of these genes were overexpressed in breast cancer and were associated with a poorer prognosis. Therefore, suppression of these genes by AR agonists may benefit patients with minor allele genotypes for these SNPs.
Conclusions
We identified AR-related PGx-eQTL SNP-gene pairs that were associated with risks, outcomes and PD effects of endocrine therapy that may provide potential biomarkers for individualized treatment of breast cancer.
Funder
Mayo Research Foundation Regis Foundation Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine Breast Cancer Research Foundation Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence Grant George M. Eisenberg Foundation Mayo Clinic Schulze Cancer for Novel Therapeutics in Cancer Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference64 articles.
1. Ingle JN, Xie F, Ellis MJ, Goss PE, Shepherd LE, Chapman J-AW, Chen BE, Kubo M, Furukawa Y, Momozawa Y, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in the long noncoding RNA MIR2052HG offer a pharmacogenomic basis for the response of breast Cancer patients to aromatase inhibitor therapy. Cancer Res. 2016;76(23):7012–23. 2. Ingle JN, Liu M, Wickerham DL, Schaid DJ, Wang L, Mushiroda T, Kubo M, Costantino JP, Vogel VG, Paik S, et al. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and pharmacogenomic variation in ZNF423 regulation of BRCA1 expression: individualized breast Cancer Prevention. Cancer Discov. 2013;3(7):812–25. 3. Ingle JN, Schaid DJ, Goss PE, Liu M, Mushiroda T, Chapman J-AW, Kubo M, Jenkins GD, Batzler A, Shepherd L, et al. Genome-wide associations and functional genomic studies of Musculoskeletal adverse events in women receiving aromatase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(31):4674–82. 4. Liu M, Goss PE, Ingle JN, Kubo M, Furukawa Y, Batzler A, Jenkins GD, Carlson EE, Nakamura Y, Schaid DJ, et al. Aromatase inhibitor-Associated Bone fractures: a Case-Cohort GWAS and Functional Genomics. Mol Endocrinol. 2014;28(10):1740–51. 5. Ingle JN, Kalari KR, Barman P, Shepherd LE, Ellis MJ, Goss PE, Buzdar AU, Robson ME, Cairns J, Carlson EE, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism biomarkers of adjuvant anastrozole-induced estrogen suppression in early breast cancer. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2020;31(1):1–9.
|
|