Better outcomes and reduced failures for arthroplasty over osteotomy for advanced compartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients older than 50 years

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundBoth compartmental knee arthroplasty (CKA) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) may be used to treat patients older than 50 years of age with advanced compartmental osteoarthritis (OA) secondary to leg axis deformities. A meta-analysis was conducted to clarify the role of open-wedge HTO versus CKA for patients older than 50 years with advanced compartmental knee OA. The present investigation aimed to analyse the clinical outcomes, implant failure and survivorship.MethodsThis meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2020, the main online databases were accessed. All clinical trials comparing the outcomes of open-wedge HTO versus CKA for compartmental knee OA were considered. Data analysis was performed through the Review Manager Software 5.3 (the Nordic Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen). Implant survivorship was analysed with a Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve that was performed using the STATA/MP software (StataCorp, College Station, TX).ResultsData from 618 (HTO, 307; CKA, 311) patients were collected. Good baseline comparability among patient age, BMI and gender was detected. The Tegner Activity Scale was higher in the CKA group (P= 0.04), as were the Lysholm score (P= 0.001), the International Knee Documentation Committee (P= 0.0001) and the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P= 0.05). At a mean follow-up of 5 years, revisions were less in the CKA cohort (OR, 2.27;P= 0.004). The Kaplan-Meier curve evidenced longer implant survivorship in favour of the CKA group (P= 0.01).ConclusionIn patients older than 50 years of age with compartmental knee OA secondary to frontal axis leg deformities, CKA performed better than open-wedge HTO.