Author:
Guo Wei,Jiang Yuan,Zhu Yang,Huang Jingwen
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To evaluate the influence of the resection of different amounts of the uncovertebral joints on the stability of the cervical spine by comparing and analyzing the stress distribution and peak displacement characteristics of the internal fixation structures and endplates.
Methods
After obtaining the CT data of a 34-year-old male healthy cervical spine, a three-dimensional finite element model was established and verified. The three-dimensional finite element method was used to establish the models of anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation surgical implants and anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation combined with the partial resection of different amounts of the unilateral or bilateral uncovertebral joints. The models were tested under six working conditions: flexion, extension, left bending, right bending, left rotation, and right rotation. The surgical models were compared regarding the stress distribution of the titanium mesh, titanium plate and screw, and endplate, and the peak displacement of the vertebral body.
Results
There were no significant differences in the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body of ACDF combined with different amounts of uncovertebral joint resection in the states of flexion and extension. However, there were significant increases in the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body in the states of left and right bending and rotation. In the states of left and right bending and rotation, the stress distribution and peak displacement of the vertebral body were significantly greater in the models with bilateral partial resection of the uncovertebral joints than in the models with unilateral partial resection of the uncovertebral joints. Bilateral resection of the uncovertebral joints by 30–40% and unilateral resection of the uncovertebral joints by 40–50% resulted in the greatest increases in the maximum stress distribution of the titanium plate and screw and the peak displacement of the vertebral body.
Conclusion
Finite element analysis of the biomechanical changes in the cervical spine showed that anterior cervical compression fusion and internal fixation combined with bilateral resection of less than 30% of the uncovertebral joints or unilateral resection of less than 40% of the uncovertebral joints had little effect on the stability of the cervical spine.
Funder
Health Commission of Hunan Province
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery
Reference35 articles.
1. Mansfield M, Smith T, Spahr N, et al. Cervical spine radiculopathy epidemiology: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care. 2020;18(4):555–67.
2. Taso M, Sommernes JH, Kolstad F, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):171.
3. Nakagawa H, Saito K, Mitsugi T, et al. Microdiscectomy and foraminotomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy: anterior versus posterior, microendoscopic surgery versus mini-open microsurgery. World Neurosurg. 2014;81(2):292–3.
4. MacDowall A, Heary RF, Holy M, et al. Posterior foraminotomy versus anterior decompression and fusion in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease with radiculopathy: up to 5 years of outcome from the national Swedish Spine Register. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;15:1–9.
5. Lubelski D, Ramhmdani S, Pennington Z, Theodore N, Bydon A. Utility of posterior longitudinal ligament resection during anterior cervical decompression for radiculopathy. World Neurosurg. 2020;137:e425–9.