Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Recent works in the scientific literature reported the role of C reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as biomarkers of disease activity in rheumatic diseases.
Objectives
To investigate the role of CAR, PLR and NLR as potential markers of disease activity in children with non-systemic JIA (nsJIA) and their correlation with the risk of persistent disease activity of flare during follow up.
Methods
Our prospective, cross-sectional study involved 130 nsJIA patients (74 with active disease and 56 with inactive disease according to Wallace criteria) and 62 healthy controls. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline (T0) and at 3 (T1), 6 (T2), 12 (T3) and 18 months (T4) during follow up. Disease activity was evaluated through Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS-27).
Results
At baseline, CRP and CAR were higher in patients than in controls (p = 0.046), while no differences were found for NLR and PLR. However, there was no positive correlation between CAR, NLR, PLR and JADAS-27 in JIA patients. To better investigate the role of CAR, NLR and PLR as markers of disease activity, we used a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model, applied to all patients either with or without active disease. According to this analysis, CAR and NLR baseline levels were predictive of higher risk of disease activity at 6 months follow up (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
CAR and NLR could indicate persistent disease activity in patients with JIA. Their predictive value could be increased by their combined use and by the observation of their trend during follow up, since increasing CAR values over time could predict a disease flare in the brief time.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference29 articles.
1. Hinze C, Gohar F, Foell D. Management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: hitting the target. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(5):290–300.
2. Guzman J, Oen K, Tucker LB, et al. ReACCh-Out investigators. The outcomes of juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children managed with contemporary treatments: results from the ReACCh-Out cohort. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(10):1854–60.
3. Kearsley-Fleet L, Heaf E, Davies R, et al. BCRD and BSPAR-ETN study groups. Frequency of biologic switching and the outcomes of switching in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a national cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2(4):e217–26.
4. Azevedo S, Tavares-Costa J, Melo AT et al. Predictive factors of relapse after methotrexate discontinuation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients with inactive disease. ARP Rheumatol 2022 Jan-Mar;1(1):12–20.
5. Rosina S, Natoli V, Santaniello S, Trincianti C, Consolaro A, Ravelli A. Novel biomarkers for prediction of outcome and therapeutic response in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021;17(8):853–70.