Inspiratory-expiratory variation of pleural line thickness in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure

Author:

Loi Barbara,Barra Pasquale Fabio,Vivalda Laura,Raimondi Francesco,De Luca DanieleORCID

Abstract

Abstract Background There are relatively few data about the ultrasound evaluation of pleural line in patients with respiratory failure. We measured the pleural line thickness during different phases of the respiratory cycle in neonates with and without acute respiratory failure as we hypothesized that this can significantly change. Methods Prospective, observational, cohort study performed in an academic tertiary neonatal intensive care unit recruiting neonates with transient tachypnoea of the neonate (TTN), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) or neonatal acute respiratory distress syndrome (NARDS). Neonates with no lung disease (NLD) were also recruited as controls. Pleural line thickness was measured with high-frequency ultrasound at end-inspiration and end-expiration by two different raters. Results Pleural line thickness was slightly but significantly higher at end-expiration (0.53 [0.43–0.63] mm) than at end-inspiration (0.5 [0.4–0.6] mm; p = 0.001) for the whole population. End-inspiratory (NLD: 0.45 [0.38–0.53], TTN: 0.49 [0.43–0.59], RDS: 0.53 [0.41–0.62], NARDS: 0.6 [0.5–0.7] mm) and -expiratory (NLD: 0.47 [0.42–0.56], TTN: 0.48 [0.43–0.61], RDS: 0.53 [0.46–0.65], NARDS: 0.61 [0.54–0.72] mm) thickness were significantly different (overall p = 0.021 for both), between the groups although the absolute differences were small. The inter-rater agreement was optimal (ICC: 0.95 (0.94–0.96)). Coefficient of variation was 2.8% and 2.5% for end-inspiratory and end-expiratory measurements, respectively. These findings provide normative data of pleural line thickness for the most common forms of neonatal acute respiratory failure and are useful to design future studies to investigate possible clinical applications.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3