Comparison of two novel diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in predicting adverse outcomes of preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study

Author:

Wang Xin,Lu Yang-Ke,Wu Yan-Yan,Liu Da-Peng,Guo Jing,Li Ming-Chao,Wang YingYuan,Li Rui,Zhang Xiao-Yuan,Kang Wen-Qing

Abstract

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare the predictive value of two diagnostic criteria for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) in preterm infants with gestational age (GA) < 32 weeks for death or severe respiratory morbidity at corrected age of 18–24 months. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data from July 2019 to September 2021 were classified by 2018 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and 2019 Jensen definitions of BPD. Based on the follow-up results, the enrolled population was divided into adverse outcome group and normal outcome group. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to explore the risk factors of adverse outcomes and evaluate the predictive value of both diagnostic criteria. Results Of 451 infants, 141 (31.3%) had adverse outcomes, which increased with increasing severity of BPD. Logistic regression analysis showed only BPD was an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in preterm infants. ROC analysis revealed that both diagnostic criteria showed similar predictive values (2018 NICHD definition AUC = 0.771 vs. 2019 Jensen definition AUC = 0.770), with specificities of 93.5% and 96.8%, respectively; however, combining them separately with GA or birth weight did not improve their predictive values. Conclusions The two novel definitions of BPD demonstrate similar predictive values in predicting death or severe respiratory morbidity at corrected age of 18–24 months, with higher specificity observed in both.

Funder

Science and Technology Department of Henan Province

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3