Abstract
AbstractOver hundreds of years, cats have been domesticated and selectively bred, resulting in numerous pedigreed breeds expedited by recent cat shows and breeding associations. Concerns have been raised about the limited breeding options and the genetic implications of inbreeding, indicating challenges in maintaining genetic diversity and accurate identification in purebred cats. In this study, genetic variability and structure were examined in 5 Thai domestic cat breeds using 15 microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop sequencing. In total, 184 samples representing the Wichien Maat (WCM), Suphalak (SL), Khao-Manee (KM), Korat (KR), and Konja (KJ) breeds were analyzed. High genetic diversity (Ho and He > 0.5) was observed in all breeds, and mtDNA analysis revealed two primary haplogroups (A and B) that were shared among all domestic cat breeds in Thailand and globally. However, minor differences were observed between Thai domestic cat breeds based on clustering analyses, in which a distinct genetic structure was observed in the WCM breed. This suggests that allele fixation for distinctive morphological traits has occurred in Thai domestic cat breeds that emerged in isolated regions with shared racial origins. Analysis of relationships among individuals within the breed revealed high identification efficiency in Thai domestic cat breeds (P(ID)sibs < 10−4). Additionally, diverse and effective individual identification can be ensured by optimizing marker efficiency by using only nine loci. This comprehensive genetic characterization provides valuable insights into conservation strategies and breeding practices for Thai domestic cat breeds.
Funder
Higher Education for Industry Consortium
Kasetsart University Research and Development Institute funds
International SciKU Branding (ISB), Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University
Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) grant through the Kasetsart University Reinventing University Program 2021
High-Quality Research Graduate Development Cooperation Project between Kasetsart University and the National Science and Technology Development Agency
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference80 articles.
1. Gentry A, Clutton-Brock J, Groves CP. The naming of wild animal species and their domestic derivatives. J Archaeol Sci. 2003;31:645–51.
2. Vigne JD. Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science. 2004;304:259–259.
3. Driscoll CA, Menotti-Raymond M, Roca AL, Hupe K, Johnson WE, Geffen E, Macdonald DW. The near Eastern origin of cat domestication. Science. 2007;317:519–23.
4. Kurushima JD. Genetic analysis of domestication patterns in the cat (Felis catus): worldwide population structure, and human-mediated breeding patterns both modern and ancient. Davis: University of California. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses; 2011. p. 148.
5. Kurushima JD, Lipinski MJ, Gandolfi B, Froenicke L, Grahn JC, Grahn RA, Lyons LA. Variation of cats under domestication: genetic assignment of domestic cats to breeds and worldwide random-bred populations. Anim Genet. 2012;44:311–24.