Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite declining mortality in most countries and in Lithuania, ovarian cancer burden has remained high. Studies have indicated that antihypertensive medications use may help to improve ovarian cancer survival, however findings remain controversial. The aim of the study was to analyse the association between post-diagnosis antihypertensive medications intake and cancer-specific survival in ovarian cancer patients.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 588 ovarian cancer cases diagnosed between 2013 and 2015. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between antihypertensive medications and ovarian cancer-specific mortality.
Results
In total, 279 (47%) patients died during the follow-up; 242 (87%) of them died due to ovarian cancer. The risk of ovarian cancer death was reduced in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) users vs. non-users (HR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36–0.83). Subgroup analysis showed better ovarian cancer survival in higher dose ACE inhibitors users (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28–0.77, p for trend 0.002); the effect was also stronger in age 51–65 years, stage I–III, surgery or chemotherapy treatment, pre-diagnosis ACE inhibitor users’ and pre-diagnosis hypertension subgroups. The risk of cancer-specific death was slightly lower among calcium-channel blocker and angiotensin-receptor blocker users and higher among beta-blocker users as compared to non-users, however chance and confounding could not be ruled out. We found no association between the use of centrally and peripherally acting antiadrenergic agents and diuretics and risk of ovarian cancer-specific mortality.
Conclusions
Our findings imply that post-diagnosis use of ACE inhibitors may be associated with reduced ovarian cancer-specific mortality; however, further research is needed for the comprehensive assessment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M et al. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2020. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today. Accessed 28 February 2023.
2. Everatt R, Intaitė B. Trends in Mortality Rates of Corpus Uteri and Ovarian Cancer in Lithuania, 1987–2016. Med (Kaunas). 2020;56(7):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56070347.
3. WCRF/AICR. Continuous Update Project Report. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and colorectal cancer. 2017. Washington (DC): American Institute for Cancer Research. https://www.wcrf.org/diet-activity-and-cancer/cancer-types/ovarian-cancer/. Accessed 06 June 2023.
4. Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, Grosse Y, Bianchini F, Straif K, International Agency for Research on Cancer Handbook Working Group. Body fatness and Cancer–viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):794–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1606602.
5. Aune D, Navarro Rosenblatt DA, Chan DS, Abar L, Vingeliene S, Vieira AR, et al. Anthropometric factors and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(8):1888–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29207.