The short term influence of right ventricular pacing burden on echocardiographic and spiroergometric parameters in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction
-
Published:2022-01-31
Issue:1
Volume:22
Page:
-
ISSN:1471-2261
-
Container-title:BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Cardiovasc Disord
Author:
Youssef Akram, Pfluecke Christian, Dawid Maciej, Ibrahim Karim, Günther Michael, Kolschmann Steffen, Richter Utz, Francke Alexander, Wunderlich Carsten, Christoph MarianORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The incidence of worsened clinical outcome due to high right ventricular (RV) pacing burden in patients with preserved left ventricular function remains controversial.
Objective
To investigate the impact of RV pacing on several echocardiographic and spiroergometric parameters.
Methods
In 60 pacemaker patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) serial echocardiographies and spiroergometries were performed over a time course of 12 months. Additionally, in 48 patients retrospective echocardiographic analyses of the LV- and RV function were carried out up to 24 months after pacemaker implantation.
Results
The patients were divided into two groups: The high RV pacing burden group (hRVP: ≥ 40%) and the low RV pacing group (lRVP < 40%) according to the definitions in previous randomized MOST and DAVID trials. After a period of 12-month pacemaker therapy no changes to left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), left ventricular end systolic diameter (LVESD), LVEF, E/A-ratio; E/E′-ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) could be revealed, independently of the RV pacing burden. Additionally, after 24-month long term follow-up there were no differences in LVEF and TAPSE in both groups. Accordingly, no relevant changes of peak exercise capacity, ventilatory anaerobic threshold or maximal oxygen consumption could be demonstrated independently of the RV pacing.
Conclusions
In pacemaker patients with preserved LVEF the burden of RV pacing has no adverse influence on several echocardiographic and spiroergometric surrogate parameters of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy after a follow-up of 12 to 24 month. Despite this, screening for pacemaker induced cardiomyopathy should be performed especially in the presence of new heart failure symptoms.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Reference36 articles.
1. Merchant FM, Hoskins MH, Musat DL, Prillinger JB, Roberts GJ, Nabutovsky Y, Mittal S. Incidence and time course for developing heart failure with high-burden right ventricular pacing. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(6):e003564. 2. Ebert M, Jander N, Minners J, Blum T, Doering M, Bollmann A, Hindricks G, Arentz T, Kalusche D, Richter S. Long-term impact of right ventricular pacing on left ventricular systolic function in pacemaker recipients with preserved ejection fraction: results from a large single-center registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(7):e003845. 3. Chen L, Hodge D, Jahangir A, Ozcan C, Trusty J, Friedman P, Rea R, Bradley D, Brady P, Hammill S, et al. Preserved left ventricular ejection fraction following atrioventricular junction ablation and pacing for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19(1):19–27. 4. Bansal R, Parakh N, Gupta A, Juneja R, Naik N, Yadav R, Sharma G, Roy A, Verma SK, Bahl VK. Incidence and predictors of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy with comparison between apical and non-apical right ventricular pacing sites. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;56(1):63–70. 5. Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP, O’Neill GP, Rothbart S, Martins JB, Roelke M, Steinberg JS, Greene HL. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Heart Rhythm. 2005;2(8):830–4.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|