Characterisation of patients referred to a tertiary-level inherited cardiac condition clinic with suspected arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC)

Abstract

Abstract Background Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) or arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is a rare inherited disease with incomplete penetrance and an environmental component. Although a rare disease, ARVC is a common cause of sudden cardiac death in young adults. Data on the different stages of ARVC remains scarce. The purpose of this study is to describe the initial presentation and cardiac phenotype of definite and non-definite ARVC for patients seen at a tertiary service. Methods This is a single centre, observational cohort study of patients with definite and non-definite ARVC seen at the Inherited Cardiac Conditions services at University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) in the period 2010–2021. Patients were identified by interrogation of digital health records, medical history, imaging and by examining 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECG). Result The records of 1451 patients were reviewed; of those, 165 patients were at risk of ARVC (mean age 41 ± 17 years, 56% male). 60 patients fulfilled task force criteria for definite ARVC diagnosis (n = 40, 67% males), and 38 (72%) of them carried a known pathogenic variant. The remaining 105 patients (50% males) were non-definite, and of these 45 (62%) carried a known pathogenic variant. Patients in the definite group were more symptomatic, with palpitations (57% vs. 17%), syncope (35% vs. 6%) and shortness of breath (28% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). T-wave inversion in V1-V3 and epsilon waves were observed only in the definite group. Both PR interval and QRS duration were longer in the definite (170 ± 34 ms and 100 ± 19 ms, p < 0.001) compared to (149 ± 25 and 91 ± 14 ms, p = 0.005). Patients with definite ARVC had significantly larger RV end diastolic areas and significantly reduced biventricular function (RVEDA = 27 ± 10 cm2, RVFAC = 37 ± 11% and EF = 56 ± 12%) compared to the non-definite group (RVEDA = 18 ± 4 cm2, RVFAC 49 ± 6% and LVEF 64 ± 7%, p < 0.001). Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred more frequently in the definite group compared to the non-definite group (27% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). Ventricular fibrillation was observed in the definite group only (8 of 60 patients, 13%). Conclusion Our study showed differences between definite and non-definite ARVC patients in terms of clinical, electrophysiological and imaging features. Major adverse cardiac events occurred more commonly in the definite group, but also were observed in non-definite ARVC. This single centre observational cohort study forms a basis for further prospective multicentre interventional studies.