Author:
Wang Yifu,Cheng Jinhua,Xu Chao,Jin Jian,Bao Wenbin,Wu Shenglong,Wu Zhengchang
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Numerous circular RNAs (circRNAs) have been recently identified in porcine tissues and cell types. Nevertheless, their significance in porcine spleen development is yet unelucidated. Herein, we reported an extensive overlook of circRNA expression profile during spleen development in Meishan pigs.
Results
Overall, 39,641 circRNAs were identified from 6,914 host genes. Among them, many circRNAs are up- or down-regulated at different time points of pig spleen development. Using WGCNA analysis, we revealed two essential modules for protein-coding genes and circRNAs. Subsequent correlation analysis revealed 67 circRNAs/co-expressed genes that participated in immnue-associated networks. Furthermore, a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network analysis of circRNAs revealed that 12 circRNAs modulated CD226, MBD2, SAMD3, SIT1, SRP14, SYTL3 gene expressions via acting as miRNA sponges. Moreover, the circRNA_21767/miR-202-3p axis regulated SIT1 expression in a ceRNA manner, which is critical for the immune-based regulation of spleen development in Meishan pigs.
Conclusions
Overall, our results demonstrated that the circRNAs were differentially expressed during different stages of porcine spleen development, meanwhile the circRNAs interacted with immune-related genes in a ceRNA-based fashion. Moreover, we presented biomedical researchers with RNAseqTools, a user-friendly and powerful software for the visualization of transcriptome profile data.
Funder
Seed Industry Vitalization Research Projects of Jiangsu Province
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Jiangsu Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference50 articles.
1. Lunney JK, Van Goor A, Walker KE, Hailstock T, Franklin J, Dai C. Importance of the pig as a human biomedical model. Sci Transl Med. 2021;13:eabd5758.
2. Clapperton M, Bishop SC, Glass EJ. Innate immune traits differ between Meishan and large White pigs. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2005;104(3–4):131–44.
3. Liang W, Li Z, Wang P, Fan P, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Xu X, Liu B. Differences of immune responses between Tongcheng (chinese local breed) and large White pigs after artificial infection with highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Virus Res. 2016;215:84–93.
4. Duchet-Suchaux MF, Bertin AM, Menanteau PS. Susceptibility of chinese Meishan and European large white pigs to enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli strains bearing colonization factor K88, 987P, K99, or F41. Am J Vet Res. 1991;52(1):40–4.
5. Chen J, Qi S, Guo R, Yu B, Chen D. Different messenger RNA expression for the antimicrobial peptides beta-defensins between Meishan and crossbred pigs. Mol Biol Rep. 2010;37(3):1633–9.