Abstract
Abstract
Background
This study aimed to evaluate the T2W hypointense ring and T2-FLAIR mismatch signs in gliomas and use these signs to construct prediction models for glioma grading and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status.
Methods
Two independent radiologists retrospectively evaluated 207 glioma patients to assess the presence of T2W hypointense ring and T2-FLAIR mismatch signs. The inter-rater reliability was calculated using the Cohen’s kappa statistic. Two logistic regression models were constructed to differentiate glioma grade and predict IDH genotype noninvasively, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the developed models.
Results
Of the 207 patients enrolled (119 males and 88 females, mean age 51.6 ± 14.8 years), 45 cases were low-grade gliomas (LGGs), 162 were high-grade gliomas (HGGs), 55 patients had IDH mutations, and 116 were IDH wild-type. The number of T2W hypointense ring signs was higher in HGGs compared to LGGs (p < 0.001) and higher in the IDH wild-type group than in the IDH mutant group (p < 0.001). There were also significant differences in T2-FLAIR mismatch signs between HGGs and LGGs, as well as between IDH mutant and wild-type groups (p < 0.001). Two predictive models incorporating T2W hypointense ring, absence of T2-FLAIR mismatch, and age were constructed. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was 0.940 for predicting HGGs (95% CI = 0.907–0.972) and 0.830 for differentiating IDH wild-type (95% CI = 0.757–0.904).
Conclusions
The combination of T2W hypointense ring, absence of T2-FLAIR mismatch, and age demonstrate good predictive capability for HGGs and IDH wild-type. These findings suggest that MRI can be used noninvasively to predict glioma grading and IDH mutation status, which may have important implications for patient management and treatment planning.
Funder
Clinical Research and Cultivation Project of Shanghai ShenKang Hospital Development Center
the Joint Research Development Project be-tween Shenkang and United Imaging on Clinical Research and Translation
National Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program of China
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Davis ME. Epidemiology and overview of Gliomas. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2018;34:420–9.
2. Bondy ML, Scheurer ME, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davis FG, Il’yasova D, et al. Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer. 2008;113:1953–68.
3. Ostrom QT, Cioffi G, Waite K, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: primary brain and other Central Nervous System tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23:iii1–105.
4. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20.
5. Vigneswaran K, Neill S, Hadjipanayis CG. Beyond the World Health Organization grading of infiltrating gliomas: advances in the molecular genetics of glioma classification. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:95.