Abstract
Abstract
Background
Mid-level practitioners (MLPs), including physician associates (PAs) and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs), have emerged to address workforce shortages in the UK and perform specific roles in relation to population needs. This has resulted in new ways of working and changes to established professional hierarchies. We conducted a study to investigate the career development, competencies, effectiveness, perceptions, and regulation of PAs and ANPs, with the aim of understanding ways to effectively integrate MLPs into the NHS workforce.
Methods
We conducted a systematic scoping review following PRISMA guidelines. Embase, Medline, the Cochrane database, Pubmed, and CINAHL databases were searched, using terms relating to PAs and ANPs in the UK. A total of 128 studies (60 on PAs and 68 on ANPs) were included in the final analysis. A narrative synthesis, guided by the pre-defined themes and emerging themes, was conducted to bring together the findings.
Results
PAs are educated on a medical model with basic medical skills but lack formal professional regulation and do not have prescribing rights. ANPs are educated on a nurse model with enhanced skills that depend on roles within specific specialities, and their governance is mostly employer-led. PAs are primarily employed in secondary care. ANPs are employed widely in both primary and secondary care. No defined career progression exists for PAs. In contrast, becoming an ANP is a form of career progression within nursing. Both roles were regarded as cost-effective in comparison to doctors performing simple tasks. PAs were less understood compared to ANPs and received a mixed reception from colleagues, which sometimes undermined their professional identity, whereas ANPs were mostly welcomed by colleagues.
Conclusions
Potential ways to better integrate PAs and ANPs into the NHS workforce include further initiatives by regulatory bodies and the NHS to create more awareness and clearer role definitions for MLPs, outline potential for career progression, offer transparency with regard to remuneration, and introduction of prescribing rights. Future research might include more cadres of MLPs and explore the international literature.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Wellcome Trust
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Public Administration
Reference62 articles.
1. World Health Organization. Global strategy on human resources for health: workforce 2030. 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/250368/9789241511131-eng.pdf.
2. Anderson M, O’Neill C, Clark JM, Street A, Woods M, Johnston-Webber C, et al. Securing a sustainable and fit-for-purpose UK health and care workforce. The Lancet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00231-2.
3. Department of Health and Social Care. DHSC evidence for the NHSPRB: pay round 2021 to 2022. 2021 [cited: 2022 Feb 1] Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dhsc-evidence-for-the-nhsprb-pay-round-2021-to-2022.
4. World Health Organization. Mid-level health workers for delivery of essential health services: A global systematic review and country experiences. Global Health Workforce Alliance. 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/mlp2013/en/.
5. Royal College of Nursing. Advanced Practice Standards 2021 [cited 2021 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/professional-development/advanced-practice-standards.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献