Blood culture versus antibiotic use for neonatal inpatients in 61 hospitals implementing with the NEST360 Alliance in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania: a cross-sectional study

Author:

Murless-Collins SarahORCID,Kawaza Kondwani,Salim Nahya,Molyneux Elizabeth M.,Chiume Msandeni,Aluvaala Jalemba,Macharia William M.,Ezeaka Veronica Chinyere,Odedere Opeyemi,Shamba Donat,Tillya Robert,Penzias Rebecca E.,Ezenwa Beatrice Nkolika,Ohuma Eric O.,Cross James H.,Lawn Joy E.,Bokea Helen,Bohne Christine,Waiyego Mary,Irimu Grace,Ogueji Ifeanyichukwu Anthony,Jenkins Georgia,Tongo Olukemi O.,Fajolu Iretiola,Olutekunbi Nike,Paul Cate,Baraka Jitihada,Kirby Rebecca,Palamountain Kara,

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundThirty million small and sick newborns worldwide require inpatient care each year. Many receive antibiotics for clinically diagnosed infections without blood cultures, the current ‘gold standard’ for neonatal infection detection. Low neonatal blood culture use hampers appropriate antibiotic use, fuelling antimicrobial resistance (AMR) which threatens newborn survival. This study analysed the gap between blood culture use and antibiotic prescribing in hospitals implementing with Newborn Essential Solutions and Technologies (NEST360) in Kenya, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania.MethodsInpatient data from every newborn admission record (July 2019–August 2022) were included to describe hospital-level blood culture use and antibiotic prescription. Health Facility Assessment data informed performance categorisation of hospitals into four tiers: (Tier 1) no laboratory, (Tier 2) laboratory but no microbiology, (Tier 3) neonatal blood culture use < 50% of newborns receiving antibiotics, and (Tier 4) neonatal blood culture use > 50%.ResultsA total of 144,146 newborn records from 61 hospitals were analysed. Mean hospital antibiotic prescription was 70% (range = 25–100%), with 6% mean blood culture use (range = 0–56%). Of the 10,575 blood cultures performed, only 24% (95%CI 23–25) had results, with 10% (10–11) positivity. Overall, 40% (24/61) of hospitals performed no blood cultures for newborns. No hospitals were categorised asTier 1because all had laboratories. OfTier 2hospitals, 87% (20/23) were District hospitals. Most hospitals could do blood cultures (38/61), yet the majority were categorised asTier 3(36/61). Only two hospitals performed > 50% blood cultures for newborns on antibiotics (Tier 4).ConclusionsThe twoTier 4hospitals, with higher use of blood cultures for newborns, underline potential for higher blood culture coverage in other similar hospitals. Understanding why these hospitals are positive outliers requires more research into local barriers and enablers to performing blood cultures.Tier 3facilities are missing opportunities for infection detection, and quality improvement strategies in neonatal units could increase coverage rapidly.Tier 2facilities could close coverage gaps, but further laboratory strengthening is required. Closing this culture gap is doable and a priority for advancing locally-driven antibiotic stewardship programmes, preventing AMR, and reducing infection-related newborn deaths.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation

ELMA Foundation

Children's Investment Fund Foundation

Lemelson Foundation

Ting Tsung and Wei Fong Chao Family Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference72 articles.

1. World Health Organization, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), PMNCH, UNFPA. Born too soon: decade of action on preterm birth. Geneva: WHO; 2023.

2. UN-Interagency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels and trends in child mortality: Report 2022. New York: UN-IGME; 2023.

3. World Health Organization. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis: current evidence, identifying gaps and future directions. Geneva: WHO; 2020.

4. Global Antibiotic Research & Development Partnership. GARDP Neonatal Sepsis Study Report. Geneva: GARDP Foundation; 2022.

5. Zaidi AKM, Huskins WC, Thaver D, Bhutta ZA, Abbas Z, Goldmann DA. Hospital-acquired neonatal infections in developing countries. Lancet. 2005;365:1175–88.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3