Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Evaluation of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias in randomized trials: focus groups, online survey, proposed recommendations and their implementation

Published:2014-04-15 Issue:1 Volume:3 Page:
ISSN:2046-4053
Container-title:Systematic Reviews
language:en
Short-container-title:Syst Rev

Author:

Savović Jelena,Weeks Laura,Sterne Jonathan AC,Turner Lucy,Altman Douglas G,Moher David,Higgins Julian PT

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2046-4053-3-37/fulltext.html

Reference21 articles.

1. Savović J, Jones HE, Altman DG, Harris RJ, Juni P, Pildal J, Als-Nielsen B, Balk EM, Gluud C, Gluud LL, Ioannidis JP, Schulz KF, Beynon R, Welton NJ, Wood L, Moher D, Deeks JJ, Sterne JA: Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2012, 157: 429-438. 10.7326/0003-4819-157-6-201209180-00537.

2. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG: Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. J Am Med Assoc. 1995, 273: 408-412. 10.1001/jama.1995.03520290060030.

3. Wood L, Egger M, Gluud LL, Schulz KF, Juni P, Altman DG, Gluud C, Martin RM, Wood AJ, Sterne JA: Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2008, 336: 601-605. 10.1136/bmj.39465.451748.AD.

4. Lundh A, Gotzsche PC: Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008, 8: 22-10.1186/1471-2288-8-22.

5. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M: Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001, 323: 42-46. 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42.

Cited by 261 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Assessment of acupuncture's effectiveness in mitigating fatigue among patients afflicted with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice;2024-11

2. The optimal dose of metformin to control conversion to diabetes in patients with prediabetes: A meta-analysis;Journal of Diabetes and its Complications;2024-10

3. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Nicardipine; a systematic review.;Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology;2024-09-09

4. A case study of the informative value of risk of bias and reporting quality assessments for systematic reviews;Systematic Reviews;2024-09-07

5. Type of fixation is not associated with range of motion after operative treatment of proximal radius fractures- a systematic review of 519 patients;JSES International;2024-09