Primary care physicians' experience of caring for children with parents with mental health illness: a qualitative study among French general practitioners and paediatricians

Author:

Ribette Cécile,Rosenthal Lucie,Raynaud Jean-Philippe,Franchitto Ludivine,Revet Alexis

Abstract

Abstract Background Parental psychiatric disorders can have a significant impact on child development and the parent-infant bond, with a high risk of attachment disorders. Early identification of difficulties in the parent–child relationship is essential to prevent consequences for the child. Childcare practitioners have a major role to play in this early detection process, through regular mandatory consultations during the first two years of a child's life. Thus, the aim of this study was to collect the experience of private practitioners in their care of children of parents with a mental health illness. Method This is a cross-sectional, observational, qualitative study. Data were collected by means of semi-structured interviews with eleven general practitioners and private paediatricians between February and July 2021 in Toulouse and its suburbs. We only included practitioners who had followed children of parents with a mental health illness. The interviews were recorded with the agreement of the participants, before being transcribed anonymously. The data were analysed with NVivo software using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Results Three main themes emerged from the results, which were further divided into several sub-themes. Addressing psychiatric disorders presents a risk for the therapeutic relationship. Practitioners express a need to preserve this relationship with the parent in joint care. Care is difficult and is permeated by the parents' emotional issues. Furthermore, practitioners face a conflict between their concerns for the parent–child bond and their desire not to stigmatise these families. They express a feeling of isolation in these follow-ups. This stressful care has a significant emotional impact on the doctors. Access to psychiatric training and multidisciplinary collaboration seem to be essential to improve the follow-up experience for practitioners, as these factors strengthen inter-professional connections. Conclusion Practitioners describe a parent-doctor relationship at risk, which is underpinned by the fear of care placement. This study illustrates the need to strengthen multidisciplinary work by promoting interprofessional exchanges, in order to improve the experience of practitioners in this care process. Addressing practitioners’ fear of discussing parental psychiatric illness is very important, so as not to delay the implementation of preventive actions that are likely to improve the developmental prognosis for children.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Family Practice

Reference49 articles.

1. Kaplan K, Salzer MS. Future directions for supporting parents with a mental illness: commentary on Schrank et al. (2015). Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol. 2016;51(6):795-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1217-4.

2. University of York, Social Policy Research Unit, U. of Y. Social Care Institute for Excellence (Great Britain), et Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Technical report for SCIE research review on the prevalence and incidence of parental mental health problems and the detection, screening and reporting of parental mental health problems. York: Social Policy Research Unit, 2008.

3. Maybery DJ, Reupert AE, Patrick K, Goodyear M, Crase L. Prevalence of parental mental illness in Australian families. Psychiatr Bull. 2009;33(1):22-6. https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.107.018861.

4. Nicholson J, Biebel K, Katz-Leavy J, Williams V. The prevalence of parenthood in adults with mental illness: implications for state and federal policymakers, programs, and providers. Popul. Dyn. p. 19.

5. Chan SY, Ho GW, Bressington D. Experiences of self‐stigmatization and parenting in Chinese mothers with severe mental illness. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019; 28(2):527‑537. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12558.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3