Abstract
AbstractThe Covid-19 pandemic has been analysed and discussed from many disciplinary perspectives. An aspect that still needs critical exploration is the role—that is, the modes and forms—of regulatory interventions during the pandemic. It is interesting to note in this regard that, in many studies, regulatory measures are labelled “non-pharmaceutical interventions”, as if they do not have any specificity on their own and only represent a theoretically residual category. The main aim of this article is instead to focus on the distinctive features of normative measures as such. As regards the article’s focus, it centres on the normative interventions in the first period of the pandemic—that is, 2020—with particular reference to Italy. We have chosen to focus on this period because the most extensive and severe restrictions introduced to combat Covid-19 were established at that time. And we have chosen to consider Italy because it was the first country, after China, to be hard hit by the virus and to react in a draconian manner. As regards the methodology, the article is based, in general and primarily, on an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. With reference to the Italian case, the study is additionally based on: first-hand data collection and analysis (especially concerning Italian normative measures mainly issued at the national level: their type, frequency, target, hierarchical relationships); second-hand data and analysis (for instance as regards the effectiveness of Italy’s and other countries’ regulatory measures). In discussing the Italian response to the Covid-19 pandemic, certain weaknesses have been identified; and possible lessons have been highlighted, in terms of both “planning” (i.e. the necessity to better pre-define concrete and circumscribed sets of actions) and of “meta-planning” (i.e. the necessity of better planning the way in which public authorities could and should plan and act). Although this article is mainly based on the Italian situation, what we can learn from this case is largely generalizable.
Funder
Dipartimento di Architettura e Studi Urbani
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Urban Studies,Architecture,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference128 articles.
1. Alber E, Arban E, Colasante P, Dirri A, Palermo F (2022) Facing the Pandemic. Italy’s functional ‘health federalism’ and dysfunctional cooperation. In: Steytler N (ed) Comparative federalism and Covid-19. Routledge, London, pp 15–32
2. Alexander ER (2005) Institutional transformation and planning. Plan Theory 4(3):209–223
3. Alexander ER (2006) Institutional design for sustainable development. Town Planning Rev 77(1):1–27
4. Alfano V, Cicatiello L, Ercolano S (2023) Assessing the effectiveness of mandatory outdoor mask policy: the natural experiment of Campania. Econ Hum Biol 50:1–12
5. Algostino A (2021) Costituzionalismo e distopia nella pandemia di Covid-19 tra fonti dell’emergenza e (s) bilanciamento dei diritti. Costituzionalismo it 1:1–80
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献