Author:
Délétroz Carole,Del Grande Claudio,Amil Samira,Bodenmann Patrick,Gagnon Marie-Pierre,Sasseville Maxime
Abstract
Abstract
Background
A psychometrically robust patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess digital health literacy for chronic patients is needed in the context of digital health. We defined measurement constructs for a new PROM in previous studies using a systematic review, a qualitative description of constructs from patients, health professionals and an item pool identification process. This study aimed to evaluate the content validity of a digital health literacy PROM for chronic patients using an e-Delphi technique.
Methods
An international three-round online Delphi (e-Delphi) study was conducted among a francophone expert panel gathering academics, clinicians and patient partners. These experts rated the relevance, improvability, and self-ratability of each construct (n = 5) and items (n = 14) of the preliminary version of the PROM on a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus attainment was defined as strong if ≥ 70% panelists agree or strongly agree. A qualitative analysis of comments was carried out to describe personal coping strategies in healthcare expressed by the panel. Qualitative results were presented using a conceptually clustered matrix.
Results
Thirty-four experts completed the study (with 10% attrition at the second round and 5% at the third round). The panel included mostly nurses working in clinical practice and academics from nursing science, medicine, public health background and patient partners. Five items were excluded, and one question was added during the consensus attainment process. Qualitative comments describing the panel view of coping strategies in healthcare were analysed. Results showed two important themes that underpin most of personal coping strategies related to using information and communications technologies: 1) questionable patient capacity to assess digital health literacy, 2) digital devices as a factor influencing patient and care.
Conclusion
Consensus was reached on the relevance, improvability, and self-ratability of 5 constructs and 11 items for a digital health literacy PROM. Evaluation of e-health programs requires validated measurement of digital health literacy including the empowerment construct. This new PROM appears as a relevant tool, but requires further validation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference69 articles.
1. European Commission. Flash Eurobarometer 404 “European citizens' digital health literacy”. 2014. https://doi.org/10.2759/88726.
2. Novillo Ortiz D. Health: digital health literacy. First Meeting of the WHO GCM/NCD Working Group on Health Literacy for NCDs. 2017 Feb 27–28 [Online]. Retrieved from https://vdocuments.mx/digital-health-literacy-world-health-organization-first-meeting-of-the-who-gcmncd.html?page=1. Accessed 22 January 2023.
3. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(2):e9. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9.
4. M-POHL. Publications [Online]. https://m-pohl.net/HLS_Project_Publications_Presentations. Accessed January 22, 2023.
5. De Gani SM, Jaks R, Bieri U, Kocher JPh. Health Literacy Survey Schweiz 2019–2021. Schlussbericht im Auftrag des Bundesamtes für Gesundheit BAG [Final report commissioned by the Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. In German with an English summary]. Zurich: Careum Stiftung; 2021. Retrieved from https://m-pohl.net/sites/m-pohl.net/files/inline-files/HLS19-21-CH_Schlussbericht_Careum%20Gesundheitskompetenz_Health%20Literacy%20Survey_20210914.pdf. Accessed 22 January 2023.