Author:
Spiers Gemma,Tan Michelle M.C.,Astbury Jayne L,Hall Alex,Ahmed Nisar,Lanyi Kate,Williams Oleta,Beyer Fiona,Craig Dawn,Hanratty Barbara
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Unpaid carers of older people, and older unpaid carers, experience a range of adverse outcomes. Supporting carers should therefore be a public health priority. Our understanding of what works to support carers could be enhanced if future evaluations prioritise under-researched interventions and outcomes. To support this, we aimed to: map evidence about interventions to support carers, and the outcomes evaluated; and identify key gaps in current evidence.
Methods
Evidence gap map review methods were used. Searches were carried out in three bibliographic databases for quantitative evaluations of carer interventions published in OECD high-income countries between 2013 and 2023. Interventions were eligible if they supported older carers (50 + years) of any aged recipient, or any aged carers of older people (50 + years).
Findings
205 studies reported across 208 publications were included in the evidence map. The majority evaluated the impact of therapeutic and educational interventions on carer burden and carers’ mental health. Some studies reported evidence about physical exercise interventions and befriending and peer support for carers, but these considered a limited range of outcomes. Few studies evaluated interventions that focused on delivering financial information and advice, pain management, and physical skills training for carers. Evaluations rarely considered the impact of interventions on carers’ physical health, quality of life, and social and financial wellbeing. Very few studies considered whether interventions delivered equitable outcomes.
Conclusion
Evidence on what works best to support carers is extensive but limited in scope. A disproportionate focus on mental health and burden outcomes neglects other important areas where carers may need support. Given the impact of caring on carers’ physical health, financial and social wellbeing, future research could evaluate interventions that aim to support these outcomes. Appraisal of whether interventions deliver equitable outcomes across diverse carer populations is critical.
Funder
National Institute for health and Care Research Policy Research Unit
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference246 articles.
1. Kingston A, Robinson L, Booth H, Knapp M, Jagger C. Projections of multi-morbidity in the older population in England to 2035: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) model. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):374–80.
2. van Oostrom SH, Gijsen R, Stirbu I, Korevaar JC, Schellevis FG, Picavet HSJ, Hoeymans N. Time trends in Prevalence of Chronic diseases and Multimorbidity not only due to aging: data from General Practices and Health Surveys. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(8):e0160264.
3. Lee J, Lau S, Meijer E, Hu P. Living longer, with or without disability? A Global and Longitudinal Perspective. Journals Gerontology: Ser A. 2020;75(1):162–7.
4. Kingston A, Comas-Herrera A, Jagger C. Forecasting the care needs of the older population in England over the next 20 years: estimates from the Population Ageing and Care Simulation (PACSim) modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(9):e447–55.
5. Projected growth in demand for. long-term care services represents a major challenge for ageing Europe [https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/news/projected-growth-demand-long-term-care-services-represents-major-challenge-ageing-europe_en]