Author:
Heylen Dieter,Day Michael,Schunack Bettina,Fourie Josephus,Labuschange Michel,Johnson Sherry,Githigia Samuel Maina,Akande Foluke Adedayo,Nzalawahe Jahashi Saidi,Tayebwa Dickson Stuart,Aschenborn Ortwin,Marcondes Mary,Madder Maxime
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Arthropod-borne pathogens and their vectors are present throughout Africa. They have been well-studied in livestock of sub-Saharan Africa, but poorly in companion animals. Given the socio-economic importance of companion animals, the African Small Companion Animal Network (AFSCAN), as part of the WSAVA Foundation, initiated a standardized multi-country surveillance study.
Methods
Macro-geographic variation in ectoparasite (ticks and fleas) and pathogen communities in dogs was assessed through molecular screening of approximately 100 infested dogs in each of six countries (Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda and Namibia), both in rural and urban settings. The most important intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors within the subpopulation of infested dogs were evaluated.
Results
Despite the large macro-geographic variation in the dogs screened, there was no consistent difference between East and West Africa in terms of the diversity and numbers of ticks. The highest and lowest numbers of ticks were found in Nigeria and Namibia, respectively. Most often, there was a higher diversity of ticks in rural habitats than in urban habitats, although the highest diversity was observed in an urban Uganda setting. With the exception of Namibia, more fleas were collected in rural areas. We identified tick species (including Haemaphysalis spinulosa) as well as zoonotic pathogens (Coxiella burnetti, Trypanosoma spp.) that are not classically associated with companion animals. Rhipicephalus sanguineus was the most abundant tick, with a preference for urban areas. Exophilic ticks, such as Haemaphysalis spp., were more often found in rural areas. Several multi-host ticks occurred in urban areas. For R. sanguineus, housing conditions and additional pets were relevant factors in terms of infestation, while for a rural tick species (Haemaphysalis elliptica), free-roaming dogs were more often infested. Tick occurrence was associated to the use of endoparasiticide, but not to the use of ectoparasiticide. The most prevalent tick-borne pathogen was Hepatozoon canis followed by Ehrlichia canis. High levels of co-parasitism were observed in all countries and habitats.
Conclusions
As dogs share a common environment with people, they have the potential to extend the network of pathogen transmission to humans. Our study will help epidemiologists to provide recommendations for surveillance and prevention of pathogens in dogs and humans.
Graphical abstract
Funder
h2020 marie skłodowska-curie actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Zipperer WC, Pickett STA. Urban ecology: patterns of population growth and ecological effects. Chichester: Wiley; 2012.
2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN. UN; 2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. Accessed 7 Sept 2021.
3. Colella V, Nguyen VL, Tan D, Lu N, Fang F, Yin ZJ, et al. Zoonotic vector-borne pathogens and ectoparasites of dogs and cats in Eastern and Southeast Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26:1221–33.
4. Perini K, Sabbion P. Urban sustainability and river restoration: green and blue infrastructure. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.
5. Hansen R, Pauleit S. From multifunctionality to multiple ecosystem services? A conceptual framework for multifunctionality in green infrastructure planning for urban areas. Ambio. 2014;43:516–29.
Cited by
25 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献