Prevalence of dental caries and associated factors among primary school children in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background Dental caries (decay or cavities) is the breakdown of teeth as a result of bacteria. Dental caries is one of the most preventable oral health problems and the most common chronic disease in primary school children. Poor dental and oral health affects the quality of children’s lives. Objectives The study aimed to synthesize the existing literature on the prevalence and associated factors of dental caries among primary school children in Ethiopia in 2024. Methodology Studies were searched through the search engines of Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Searching was made using keywords and MeSH terms for dental caries, dental plaque, primary school children, and Ethiopia. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. A random-effects model with a 95% confidence interval was used for prevalence and odds ratio estimations. Result The result of seven studies disclosed that the overall prevalence of dental caries in primary school children in Ethiopia was 35% (26–45%). high intake of sweets (OR = 2.71,95%CI:1.968–3.451), a poor habit of tooth cleaning (OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 2.761–5.045), Grade level 1–4(OR = 2.46; 95% CI: 1.523–3.397), having a history of toothache(OR = 2.99; 95% CI: 2.679–3.314), absence of toothpaste use(OR = 1.42; 95% CI: -1.278-4.109), reduction of the previous year’s academic score(OR = 5.51; 95% CI: 1.952–9.066), had a significant microbial load(OR = 3.82, CI: 3.439–4.192) and have acid bacillary pH on their teeth(OR = 2.42, CI: 1.494–3.335) were independent variables associated with dental carries among primary school children. Conclusion The overall prevalence of dental caries among primary school children in Ethiopia is 35%, ranging from 26 to 45%. However, variations in prevalence rates are observed based on sampling techniques. Studies using simple random sampling report a higher prevalence rate of 42%, while those employing multi-stage random sampling and systematic random sampling show lower rates of 30% and 35%, respectively. This indicates that the choice of sampling technique can impact reported prevalence rates, with simple random sampling yielding higher estimates compared to other methods.