Dentists’ perspectives, practices, and factors associated with informed consent process for fixed prosthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study of kampala metropolitan area, Uganda
-
Published:2024-05-27
Issue:1
Volume:24
Page:
-
ISSN:1472-6831
-
Container-title:BMC Oral Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:BMC Oral Health
Author:
Ndagire Barbara,Barugahare John,Naidoo Sudeshni,Nankabirwa Joaniter,Nakayaga Joan,Rwenyonyi Charles Mugisha
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Dentists have a legal and ethical obligation to obtain informed consent from patients before carrying out treatment. In Uganda, the process of obtaining informed consent in dentistry is not well documented. The aim of the present study was to determine dentists’ perspectives and practices regarding informed consent to fixed prosthodontic treatment (FPT) in Kampala Metropolitan, Uganda.
Methods
A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among 153 dentists from July to September 2023. Data were collected using a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire that included both closed- and open-ended questions. The questionnaire included items on participants’ sociodemographic information, perspectives, and practices about informed consent for FPT. Perspectives were rated using ten items on a five-point Likert scale. The minimum possible total score was 10, and the maximum possible score was 50. Descriptive statistics and Poisson regression were used to summarize and analyze the quantitative data, and the significance level was set at p < 0.05. Open-ended items were analyzed using content analysis.
Results
The majority (83.9%) of the participants were general dentists with working experience ranging from 1 to 38 years and a median of 8 years. The majority were familiar with the concept of informed consent and had positive perspectives regarding its use for FPT. The mean score for perspectives was 39.27 (SD, 5.42). However, there were variations in the practices of the dentists. More than three-quarters (87.6%) reported that they always obtained the patient’s informed consent before FPT. Less than a third (29.4%) obtained written consent for FPT. About half of the dentists provided information regarding the procedure, benefits, and risks of treatment during the consent process. Bivariate analysis showed that the use of written consent for FPT was significantly (p < 0.05) associated with having a work experience of more than 10 years and having had training involving informed consent after undergraduate studies.
Conclusion
The present study provides baseline data regarding perspectives and practices regarding informed consent for FPT among dentists in Uganda. It is recommended that regular training courses be developed to highlight the importance of improved informed consent practices for patient protection and to instruct dentists about obtaining valid informed consent. There is a need for future research to streamline guidelines for the informed consent process in dental care in Uganda.
Funder
Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference42 articles.
1. Devadiga A. Informed consent and the dentist. J Health Ethics. 2012;8(1):1–16.
2. Jameson LM, Al-Tarawneh SK. Informed consent from a historical, societal, ethical, legal, and practical perspective. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(6):464–71.
3. Kakar H, Gambhir RS, Singh S, Kaur A, Nanda T. Informed consent: corner stone in ethical medical and dental practice. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(1):68–71.
4. Sherman KA, Kilby CJ, Pehlivan M, Smith B. Adequacy of measures of informed consent in medical practice: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0251485.
5. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. In., 7th edn. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.