Author:
Taha Nessrin A,Makahleh Nisrein,Hatipoglu Fatma Pertek
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Adequate knowledge of root canal morphology and its variation is essential for success of root canal treatment and to overcome treatemnt failure. The aim of this study was to investigate the root and canal morphology of mandibular anterior teeth using 2 classification systems.
Methods
3342 lower anteriors were evaluated from 557 CBCT scans. The images were examined in sagittal, axial and coronal views using a CS 3D imaging software (V3.10.4, Carestream Dental). Demographic data recorded, the number of roots and canal’s morphology were described according to Vertucci and Ahmed classifications.
Results
Frequency of Type I configuration was significantly the highest in incisors and canines (76%, N = 2539), followed by Type III (20.6%, N = 687). Type II (1.1%, N = 37), IV (1.1%, N = 37), and V (0.3%, N = 11) were rarely encountered. 0.9% (N = 31) of the teeth could not be classified with the Vertucci System. The frequency of 2 roots (2MA in Ahmed classification) which has no correspondence in the Vertucci classification, was 1.1% (N = 38), it was significantly higher in canines and in females (35 canines and 3 laterals). A moderate correlation in root canal morpology was found between the left and right sides (V > 0.30). 80% (N = 2538) of the teeth did not exhibit any divergence/merging. The bifurcation level occurred mostly in the middle third of the root.
Conclusions
One fourth of anterior teeth had variation from the simple type I canal configuration and therefore requires attention during treatment. The new classification system offers a more accurate and simplified presentation of canal morphology.
Clinical relevance
The prevalence and mid root bifurcation of second canal in lower anteriors requires attention to ensure adequate quality root canal treatment without compromising the integrity of teeth.
Funder
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference40 articles.
1. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Top. 2005;10:3–29.
2. Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, et al. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. J Oral Sc. 2020;62:93–7.
3. Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30:391–8.
4. Nogueira Leal da Silva EJ, Queiroz de Castro RW, Nejaim Y, et al. Evaluation of root canal configuration of maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth using cone beam computed tomography: an in-vivo study. Quintessence Int. 2016;47:19–24.
5. Çalişkan MK, Pehlivan Y, Sepetçioğlu F, et al. Root canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Turkish population. J Endod. 1995;21:200–4.