Author:
Shafiee S. Ali,Vedadhir AbouAli,Razaghi Emran
Abstract
AbstractDrug use is a critical behavioral disorder or a delinquency behavior (in the judiciary system's words) that comes with a burden at multiple levels: individual, community, public, and global. These social structures apply different interventions to reduce this burden in their field. Given the society as a whole, these structures must be harmonious and synergistic to optimize these endeavors in terms of cost–benefit. In practice, however, reducing the burden of addiction is followed by conflicting approaches by different organizations, in terms such as “eradicating drugs,” “eliminating drug users,” “obliterating addiction,” and ultimately, drug use harm reduction. In the harm reduction philosophy, drug use is recognized as an inescapable fact in human societies, and tries to control its personal and public consequences in different dimensions (health, economic, and social). Therefore, this approach includes broad measures such as: changing the pattern of consumption (from high-risk substances to less dangerous substances) through modification of the laws and law enforcement measures, distributing disposable syringes to prevent HIV transmission, providing basic life needs such as shelter for street-based drug users to reduce the social consequences like homelessness, prescribing substitute agonists to reduce the committing crime to obtain the needed drugs, and even the drug court program, which prevents the exacerbation of complications in a person with a chronic and relapsing disorder, due to the imposition of inappropriate sentences (like incarceration in unacceptable conditions). It is contrary to the approaches that aim to reduce the drug supply rate and drug use incidence and prevalence to zero. As a result of the conflict of interests, goals discrepancies, and differences in organizational culture, these approaches may contrast with each other. We see this in the harm reduction between the health system and law enforcement. Different factors affect the harmony or conflict between these two structures. This article addresses the impact of ideology, social conditions, and bureaucratic administration on the relationship between the health system and the police in drug use harm reduction in Iran.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference29 articles.
1. Saboor & Ordoobadi. Addiction is the scourge of the 20th century. Tabriz: Azerbadghan University; 1974.
2. McLaughlin GT, Quinn TM. Drug control in Iran: a legal and historical analysis. Iowa L Rev. 1973;59:469.
3. Cronin S. The making of modern Iran: state and society under Riza Shah, 1921–1941. Routledge; 2003.
4. Siassi I, Fozouni B. Dilemmas of Iran’s opium maintenance program: an action research for evaluating goal conflicts and policy changes. Int J Adhes. 1980;15(8):1127–40.
5. The legal bill to intensify the punishment of the perpetrators of drug crimes and protective and therapeutic measures for the treatment and employment of drug addicts 1980 (The Revolutionary Council). Retrieved from the Islamic Parliament Research Center. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/law/show/98942.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献