COVID-19, multiple emergencies, and moral entanglements: extraordinary and transcendental moral worlds as a new analytical framework

Author:

Ali InayatORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a multitude of complex emergencies, extending beyond the realm of health and healthcare. The situation presented a significant challenge to human security. The content analysis and literature review provide evidence of varied choices and decision-making processes at individual, local, national, and global levels in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. These decisions were influenced by various factors such as time constraints, limited resources, unfamiliar situations, unpredictable outcomes, and the uncertainty surrounding the end of the pandemic. The necessity to make exceptional moral decisions posed a challenge to existing conceptual and analytical frameworks, including Arthur Kleinman’s concept of “local moral worlds.” An examination of emergency medicine, particularly in the context of a critical global event, revealed the presence of numerous ethical decisions that, I suggest, may better be termed extraordinary local moral worlds and transcendental moral worlds. Following the development of an effective vaccine and the official declaration of the end of the pandemic, a thorough assessment of these impacts has commenced at various levels. We have observed a growing sense of regret regarding numerous decisions made amidst this exceptional circumstance. Not only can individuals regret over their choices, but governments and stakeholders, including the World Health Organization (WHO), may also find themselves regretting decisions that were initially seen as pragmatic in containing the virus and flattening the curve. Individuals can also experience regret over their choices. To illustrate the exceptional impacts of the pandemic on “ordinary people”, I specifically draw upon the case of thalassemia patients from Pakistan as these patients required blood to survive, thus, they serve as a significant example of making certain choices. Lastly, I contend that it is crucial to reexamine these choices in order to gain valuable insights that can inform more moral and practical choices in the future.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3