Author:
Nankya Harriet,Wamala Edward,Alibu Vincent Pius,Barugahare John
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Generally, there is unanimity about the value of community engagement in health-related research. There is also a growing tendency to view genetics and genomics research (GGR) as a special category of research, the conduct of which including community engagement (CE) as needing additional caution. One of the motivations of this study was to establish how differently if at all, we should think about CE in GGR.
Aim
To assess the perspectives of genetics and genomics researchers in Uganda on CE in GGR.
Method
A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at Makerere University and Uganda Virus Research Institute. Twenty-five individuals participated, the majority being male (sixteen). Participants included nineteen genetics and genomics researchers (researchers and research coordinators), two CE officers, three nurses and one nursing counsellor. Data were collected using in-depth interviews and analyzed in a thematic manner using NVivo version 12 Plus.
Study findings
Thirteen of the respondents had conducted CE in their GGR in either a geographical and disease-specific community. Some respondents said CE principles are the same and there is no need for special consideration for CE in GGR. Others gave ethical issues in GGR that require special consideration for CE in such research and these were categorized into six themes: GGR is new to communities, Difficulty in communicating GGR by the researchers, Genes are shared in communities, Cultural sensitivities against GGR, Community attitude toward GGR, Some GGR studies take long to end, and Negotiation of research benefits. Special considerations for CE when conducting GGR were suggested and categorized into seven themes: creating awareness of GGR in communities, obtaining both community acceptance and individual consent, CE team composition, involve communities in solving GGR challenges, prolong CE in some GGR, develop guidelines for CE in GGR, and legal considerations on GGR.
Conclusion
GGR was characterized by special issues that require special CE considerations for such research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science),Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference51 articles.
1. Khoury MJ. Genetics and genomics in practice: the continuum from genetic Disease to genetic information in health and Disease. Genet Sci. 2003;5(4):261–8.
2. Rebbeck TR, Bridges JF, Mack JW, Gray SW, Trent JM, George S, et al. editors. A framework for promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in genetics and genomics research. JAMA Health Forum; 2022: American Medical Association.
3. van Delden JJ, van der Graaf R. Revised CIOMS international ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. JAMA. 2017;317(2):135–6.
4. Siskind R, Morar NS, Campbell RD, Schouten J. P07. 05 Implementing Community Involvement in National Institutes of Health (NIH) HIV/AIDS Clinical Trials Networks.
5. Hannah S, Ecuru J, Likhitwonnawut U, Slack C, Yola N. P07. 03 increasing the National Impact and Uptake of Good Participatory Practice guidelines for Biomedical HIV Prevention (GPP): three Country Case studies. Innovation.7:04.