How initial policy responses to COVID-19 contributed to shaping dying at home preferences and care provision: key informant perspectives from Canada

Author:

Cherba Maria,Funk Laura,Scott Erin,Salman Bora,Rounce Andrea,Mackenzie Corey,Stajduhar Kelli,Dujela Carren,Krawczyk Marian,Cohen S. Robin

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In response to COVID-19’s first wave, provincial governments rapidly implemented several public health directives, including isolation measures and care facility visitor restrictions, which profoundly affected healthcare delivery at the end of life and dying experiences and perceptions. The objective of this study was to identify implications of early policy changes for dying at home. Methods Analysis of interviews with 29 key informants with expertise in the policy and practice context of dying at home and care for those dying at home was conducted as part of a larger mixed-methods study on dying at home in Canada. Results Initial pandemic policy responses, especially visitor restrictions and limitations to home care services, shaped dying at home in relation to three themes: (1) increasing preferences and demand for, yet constrained system ability to support dying at home; (2) reinforcing and illuminating systemic reliance on and need for family/friend caregivers and community organizations, while constraining their abilities to help people die at home; and (3) illuminating challenges in developing and implementing policy changes during a pandemic, including equity-related implications. Conclusion This study contributes to broader understanding of the multifaceted impacts of COVID-19 policy responses in various areas within Canadian healthcare systems. Implications for healthcare delivery and policy development include (1) recognizing the role of family/friend caregivers and community organizations in end-of-life care, (2) recognizing health inequities at the end of life, and (3) considering possible changes in future end-of-life preferences and public attitudes about dying at home and responsibility for end-of-life care.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

Reference51 articles.

1. Lavoie JG, Clark W, Romanescu RG, Phillips-Beck W, Star L, Dutton R. Mapping manitoba’s health policy response to the outbreak. In: Rounce A, Levasseur K, editors. COVID-19 in Manitoba: public policy response to the first wave. University of Manitoba Press; 2020. p.10–25.

2. Flood CM, MacDonnell V, Philpot J, Thériault S, Venkatapuram S. Overview of COVID-19: Old and new vulnerabilities. In: Flood CM, MacDonnell V, Philpott J, Thériault S, Venkatapuram S, editors Vulnerable: the law, policy, and ethics of COVID-19. University of Ottawa Press; 2020:1–27.

3. Arya A, Buchman S, Gagnon B, Downar J. Pandemic palliative care: beyond ventilators and saving lives. CMAJ. 2020;192(15):E400–4.

4. Mellett J. Creating a new narrative for dying well with COVID-19. Impact Ethics. 2020 May 1. https://impactethics.ca/2020/05/01/creating-a-new-narrative-for-dying-well-with-covid-19/.

5. World Health Organization. Assessing the development of palliative care worldwide: A set of actionable indicators. 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240033351.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3