Author:
Eriksson Mats,Blomberg Karin,Arvidsson Eva,Van Poel Esther,Ares-Blanco Sara,Astier-Peña Maria Pilar,Collins Claire,Gabrani Jonila,Stylianou Neophytos,Tkachenko Victoria,Willems Sara
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Changes in demographics with an older population, the illness panorama with increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and the shift from hospital care to home-based care place demand on primary health care, which requires multiprofessional collaboration and team-based organization of work. The COVID-19 pandemic affected health care in various ways, such as heightened infection control measures, changing work practices, and increased workload.
Objectives
This study aimed to investigate the association between primary care practices’ organization, and quality and safety changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Design
Data were collected from 38 countries in a large online survey, the PRICOV-19 study. For this paper, the participating practices were categorized as “Only GPs”, comprising practices with solely general practitioners (GPs) and/or GP trainees, without any other health care professionals (n = 1,544), and “Multiprofessional,” comprising practices with at least one GP or GP trainee and one or more other health professionals (n = 3,936).
Results
Both categories of practices improved in infection control routines when compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger proportion of the multiprofessional practices changed their routines to protect vulnerable patients. Telephone triage was used in more “Multiprofessional” practices, whereas “Only GPs” were more likely to perform video consultations as an alternative to physical visits. Both types of practices reported that the time to review new guidelines and scientific literature decreased during the pandemic. However, both had more meetings to discuss directives than before the pandemic.
Conclusions
Multiprofessional teams were keener to introduce changes to the care organization to protect vulnerable patients. However, practices with only GPs were found to be more aligned with video consultations, perhaps reflecting the close patient-doctor relationship. In contrast, telephone triage was used more in multiprofessional teams.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. WHO. Operational framework for primary health care: transforming vision into action. Geneva: World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF); 2020.
2. Garattini L, Badinella Martini M, Nobili A. General practice in the EU: countries you see, customs you find. Eur J Health Econ. 2023;24(2):153–6.
3. WHO. Imbalances in rural primary care: a scoping literature review with an emphasis on the WHO European Region. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. 2018. Contract No.: WHO/HIS/SDS/2018.58.
4. Akman M, Ayhan Baser D, Usanma Koban B, Marti T, Decat P, Lefeuvre Y, et al. Organization of primary care. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2022;23:e49.
5. Freund T, Everett C, Griffiths P, Hudon C, Naccarella L, Laurant M. Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world? Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(3):727–43.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献