Factors facilitating the implementation of a clinical decision support system in primary care practices: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis

Author:

Piotrowski Alexandra,Coenen Jana,Rupietta Christian,Basten Jale,Muth Christiane,Söling Sara,Zimmer Viola,Karbach Ute,Kellermann-Mühlhoff Petra,Köberlein-Neu Juliane,van den Akker Marjan,Beckmann Till,Brandt Benjamin,Brünn Robin,Chapidi Kiran,Dinh Truc Sophia,Düvel Lara,Flaig Benno,Flume Mathias,Gerlach Ferdinand M.,Glasziou Paul,Gonzalez-Gonzalez Ana Isabel,Grandt Daniel,Grandt Simone,Greiner Wolfgang,Hammerschmidt Reinhard,Harder Sebastian,Ihle Peter,Jachmich Julia,Klaaßen-Mielke Renate,Leicher Eva,Lemke Dorothea,Meyer Frank,Meyer Ingo,Müller Beate S.,Müller Thomas,Perera Rafael,Pfaff Holger,Richard Johanna,Surmann Bastian,Timmesfeld Nina,Trampisch Hans J.,

Abstract

Abstract Background Understanding how to implement innovations in primary care practices is key to improve primary health care. Aiming to contribute to this understanding, we investigate the implementation of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) as part of the innovation fund project AdAM (01NVF16006). Originating from complexity theory, the practice change and development model (PCD) proposes several interdependent factors that enable organizational-level change and thus accounts for the complex settings of primary care practices. Leveraging the PCD, we seek to answer the following research questions: Which combinations of internal and external factors based on the PCD contribute to successful implementation in primary care practices? Given these results, how can implementation in the primary care setting be improved? Methods We analyzed the joint contributions of internal and external factors on implementation success using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). QCA is a set-theoretic approach that allows to identify configurations of multiple factors that lead to one outcome (here: successful implementation of a CDSS in primary care practices). Using survey data, we conducted our analysis based on a sample of 224 primary care practices. Results We identified two configurations of internal and external factors that likewise enable successful implementation. The first configuration enables implementation based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivation, High Capability for Development, and Strong Outside Motivation; the second configuration based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivators, Many Options for Development and the absence of High Capability for Development. Conclusion In line with the PCD, our results demonstrate the importance of the combination of internal and external factors for implementation outcomes. Moreover, the two identified configurations show that different ways exist to achieve successful implementation in primary care practices. Trial registration AdAM was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03430336) on February 6, 2018.

Funder

The Innovation Fund of the German Federal Joint Committee

Bergische Universität Wuppertal

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3