Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma

Author:

Sermonesi Giacomo,Tian Brian W. C. A.,Vallicelli Carlo,Abu‑Zidan Fikri M.,Damaskos Dimitris,Kelly Michael Denis,Leppäniemi Ari,Galante Joseph M.,Tan Edward,Kirkpatrick Andrew W.,Khokha Vladimir,Romeo Oreste Marco,Chirica Mircea,Pikoulis Manos,Litvin Andrey,Shelat Vishal Girishchandra,Sakakushev Boris,Wani Imtiaz,Sall Ibrahima,Fugazzola Paola,Cicuttin Enrico,Toro Adriana,Amico Francesco,Mas Francesca Dal,De Simone Belinda,Sugrue Michael,Bonavina Luigi,Campanelli Giampiero,Carcoforo Paolo,Cobianchi Lorenzo,Coccolini Federico,Chiarugi Massimo,Di Carlo Isidoro,Di Saverio Salomone,Podda Mauro,Pisano Michele,Sartelli Massimo,Testini Mario,Fette Andreas,Rizoli Sandro,Picetti Edoardo,Weber Dieter,Latifi Rifat,Kluger Yoram,Balogh Zsolt Janos,Biffl Walter,Jeekel Hans,Civil Ian,Hecker Andreas,Ansaloni Luca,Bravi Francesca,Agnoletti Vanni,Beka Solomon Gurmu,Moore Ernest Eugene,Catena Fausto

Abstract

Abstract Background Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. Methods This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. Results A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. Conclusions The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Emergency Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3