Perceived helpfulness of treatment for generalized anxiety disorder: a World Mental Health Surveys report

Author:

Stein Dan J.ORCID,Kazdin Alan E.,Ruscio Ayelet Meron,Chiu Wai Tat,Sampson Nancy A.,Ziobrowski Hannah N.,Aguilar-Gaxiola Sergio,Al-Hamzawi Ali,Alonso Jordi,Altwaijri Yasmin,Bruffaerts Ronny,Bunting Brendan,de Girolamo Giovanni,de Jonge Peter,Degenhardt Louisa,Gureje Oye,Haro Josep Maria,Harris Meredith G.,Karam Aimee,Karam Elie G.,Kovess-Masfety Viviane,Lee Sing,Medina-Mora Maria Elena,Moskalewicz Jacek,Navarro-Mateu Fernando,Nishi Daisuke,Posada-Villa José,Scott Kate M.,Viana Maria Carmen,Vigo Daniel V.,Xavier Miguel,Zarkov Zahari,Kessler Ronald C.,Aguilar-Gaxiola Sergio,Al-Hamzawi Ali,Al-Kaisy Mohammed Salih,Alonso Jordi,Altwaijri Yasmin A.,Andrade Laura Helena,Atwoli Lukoye,Benjet Corina,Borges Guilherme,Bromet Evelyn J.,Bruffaerts Ronny,Bunting Brendan,Caldas-de-Almeida Jose Miguel,Cardoso Graça,Chatterji Somnath,Cia Alfredo H.,Degenhardt Louisa,Demyttenaere Koen,Florescu Silvia,de Girolamo Giovanni,Gureje Oye,Haro Josep Maria,Harris Meredith G.,Hinkov Hristo,Hu Chi-yi,de Jonge Peter,Karam Aimee Nasser,Karam Elie G.,Kawakami Norito,Kessler Ronald C.,Kiejna Andrzej,Kovess-Masfety Viviane,Lee Sing,Lepine Jean-Pierre,McGrath John J.,Medina-Mora Maria Elena,Mneimneh Zeina,Moskalewicz Jacek,Navarro-Mateu Fernando,Piazza Marina,Posada-Villa Jose,Scott Kate M.,Slade Tim,Stagnaro Juan Carlos,Stein Dan J.,ten Have Margreet,Torres Yolanda,Viana Maria Carmen,Vigo Daniel V.,Whiteford Harvey,Williams David R.,Wojtyniak Bogdan,

Abstract

Abstract Background Treatment guidelines for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are based on a relatively small number of randomized controlled trials and do not consider patient-centered perceptions of treatment helpfulness. We investigated the prevalence and predictors of patient-reported treatment helpfulness for DSM-5 GAD and its two main treatment pathways: encounter-level treatment helpfulness and persistence in help-seeking after prior unhelpful treatment. Methods Data came from community epidemiologic surveys in 23 countries in the WHO World Mental Health surveys. DSM-5 GAD was assessed with the fully structured WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview Version 3.0. Respondents with a history of GAD were asked whether they ever received treatment and, if so, whether they ever considered this treatment helpful. Number of professionals seen before obtaining helpful treatment was also assessed. Parallel survival models estimated probability and predictors of a given treatment being perceived as helpful and of persisting in help-seeking after prior unhelpful treatment. Results The overall prevalence rate of GAD was 4.5%, with lower prevalence in low/middle-income countries (2.8%) than high-income countries (5.3%); 34.6% of respondents with lifetime GAD reported ever obtaining treatment for their GAD, with lower proportions in low/middle-income countries (19.2%) than high-income countries (38.4%); 3) 70% of those who received treatment perceived the treatment to be helpful, with prevalence comparable in low/middle-income countries and high-income countries. Survival analysis suggested that virtually all patients would have obtained helpful treatment if they had persisted in help-seeking with up to 10 professionals. However, we estimated that only 29.7% of patients would have persisted that long. Obtaining helpful treatment at the person-level was associated with treatment type, comorbid panic/agoraphobia, and childhood adversities, but most of these predictors were important because they predicted persistence rather than encounter-level treatment helpfulness. Conclusions The majority of individuals with GAD do not receive treatment. Most of those who receive treatment regard it as helpful, but receiving helpful treatment typically requires persistence in help-seeking. Future research should focus on ensuring that helpfulness is included as part of the evaluation. Clinicians need to emphasize the importance of persistence to patients beginning treatment.

Funder

Please see manuscript

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3