Effectiveness of a recovery workshop implemented in community mental health services in Catalonia (Spain): study protocol for a non-randomized controlled trial

Author:

Sampietro Hernán María,Barrios Maite,Guilera GeorginaORCID,Rojo J. Emilio,Gómez-Benito Juana

Abstract

Abstract Background Many countries today are undergoing a paradigm shift in mental health policies towards a recovery-oriented and rights-based approach. From this perspective, self-determination and self-management are fundamental factors for recovery. Despite this shift, there is still a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of training programmes aimed at promoting self-determination and self-management in recovery processes implemented in southern European or Spanish-speaking countries. The aim of this paper is to present a study protocol that evaluates the effectiveness of a 12-session recovery workshop implemented in community mental health services in Catalonia (Spain). Methods/design This is a 12-week follow-up multi-centre non-randomized controlled trial design. At least 160 users will be recruited from 13 Community Rehabilitation Services (CRS) in Catalonia. Eligible participants are adult (≥ 18 years old) users of a CRS, who sign a written consent to participate. The experimental group participates in a recovery workshop, in which people learn to develop and implement their own plan of personal recovery, which includes a Wellness Toolbox, a Maintenance Toolkit, a Personal Growth Plan, a Mirror of Relapses, a Crisis Plan, and a Learning Agenda. The control group participates in the usual activities of the CRS. Data is collected using a questionnaire of sociodemographic characteristics, personal recovery, empowerment, hope and perceived social support. The users’ measurements are taken at the baseline and one week after the end of the workshop. The primary outcome measures include the Self-Identified Stage of Recovery and the Maryland Assessment of Recovery in Serious Mental Illness Scale (short version). The secondary outcome measures include the Netherlands Empowerment List, Dispositional Hope Scale, and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Descriptive statistics for characterizing the sample size will be performed. Multivariate analyses for repeated measures designs will be used to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes. Between-group and within-subject comparisons will be conducted. Discussion The results of the study will provide information on the usefulness of recovery workshops in a Mediterranean cultural context. Additionally, if this workshop is effective, it will be proposed for inclusion within the portfolio of community mental health services in Catalonia. Trial Registration ISRCTN11695542 (Registration date: 5 July 2022).

Funder

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación

María de Maeztu Unit of Excellence

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Reference43 articles.

1. Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16(4):11–23.

2. Shepherd G, Boardman J, Slade M. Making Recovery a Reality. Scottish Recover Netw [Internet]. 2008;1–23. Available from: http://www.scmh.org.uk/pdfs/Recovery_lived_experience_perspective.pdf.

3. SAMHSA. Recovery for ME Mental Health Services: Practice Guidelines for Recovery- Oriented Care. SA SA and MH. editor. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2011.

4. Copeland ME. Self-Determination in Mental Health Recovery: Taking Back Our Lives. In: Jonikas JA, Cook JA, editors. National Self-Determination & Psychiatric Disability Invitational Conference [Internet]. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois; 2004. p. 68–82. Available from: https://www.theweb.ngo/history/recovery/UICsdconfdoc19.pdf#page=74.

5. Mancini AD. Self-determination theory: A framework for the recovery paradigm. Adv Psychiatr Treat [Internet]. 2008;14(5):358–65. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0A9A444A1A7B88D187CF63B2F7C24589/S135551460000506Xa.pdf/selfdetermination_theory_a_framework_for_the_recovery_paradigm.pdf.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3