Author:
Shahzad Muhammad,Jamil Brekhna,Bushra Mehboob,Mahboob Usman,Elmigdadi Fayig
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Research evidence suggests gender-based differences in the extent and experiences of academic leaders across the globe even in developed countries like USA, UK, and Canada. The under-representation is particularly common in higher education organizations, including medical and dental schools. The current study aimed to investigate gender-based distribution and explore leaders’ experiences in the medical and dental institutes in a developing country, Pakistan.
Methods
A mixed-method approach was used. Gender-based distribution data of academic leaders in 28 colleges including 18 medical and 10 dental colleges of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan were collected. Qualitative data regarding the experiences of academic leaders (n = 10) was collected through semi-structured interviews followed by transcription and thematic analysis using standard procedures.
Results
Gender-based disparities exist across all institutes with the greatest differences among the top-rank leadership level (principals/deans) where 84.5% of the positions were occupied by males. The gender gap was relatively narrow at mid-level leadership positions reaching up to as high as > 40% of female leaders in medical/dental education. The qualitative analysis found gender-based differences in the experiences under four themes: leadership attributes, leadership journey, challenges, and support.
Conclusions
The study showed that women are not only significantly under-represented in leadership positions in medical and dental colleges in Pakistan, they also face gender-based discrimination and struggling to maintain a decent work life balance. These findings are critical and can have important implications for government, organizations, human resource managers, and policymakers in terms of enacting laws, proposing regulations, and establishing support mechanisms to improve gender-based balance and help current and aspiring leaders in their leadership journey.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference39 articles.
1. Cassells R, Duncan AS. Gender equity insights 2019: Breaking through the glass ceiling. Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre Report series [Internet]. 2019 Mar [cited 2022 Dec 20]; https://ideas.repec.org//p/ozl/bcecrs/ge04.html
2. Coder L, Spiller M. Leadership Education and Gender Roles: Think Manager, Think ‘?’ The Academy of Educational Leadership Journal [Internet]. 2013 Jul 1 [cited 2023 Dec 18]; https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Leadership-Education-and-Gender-Roles%3A-Think-Think-Coder-Spiller/0dc762a868621fab949e0159187a40ff95a7393e
3. OECD. Gender - OECD [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 Apr 22]. https://www.oecd.org/gender/
4. Schrijver NJ. Fifty years International Human rights covenants: improving the Global Protection of Human rights by bridging the gap. Between Two Continents. 2016;41(4):457–64.
5. Stamarski CS, Son Hing LS. Gender inequalities in the workplace: the effects of organizational structures, processes, practices, and decision makers’ sexism. Front Psychol. 2015;6. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01400/full