Author:
Ahmed Naseer,Aziz Samiya,Jouhar Rizwan,Rehmat Muneeba,Maqsood Afsheen,Nadeem Resham,Magsi Laraib,Heboyan Artak
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
To analyze the satisfaction levels, perceptions of developing clinical competencies through objective structured clinical examination and to explore the experiences, challenges, and suggestions of undergraduate dental students.
Methods
The study adopted a mixed-method convergent design. Quantitative data were collected from 303 participants through surveys, evaluating satisfaction levels with objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Additionally, qualitative insights were gathered through student focus group interviews, fundamental themes were developed from diverse expressions on various aspects of OSCE assessments. The Chi-Square tests, was performed to assess associations between variables. Data integration involved comparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative findings to derive comprehensive conclusions.
Results
The satisfaction rates include 69.4% for the organization of OSCE stations and 57.4% for overall effectiveness. However, a crucial challenge was identified, with only 36.7% of students receiving adequate post-OSCE feedback. Furthermore, a majority of students (50%) expressed concerns about the clinical relevance of OSCEs. The study showed a significant associations (p < 0.05) between satisfaction levels and years of study as well as previous OSCE experience. Student focus group interviews revealed diverse perspectives on OSCE assessments. While students appreciate the helpfulness of OSCEs, concerns were raised regarding time constraints, stress, examiner training, and the perceived lack of clinical relevance.
Conclusion
The students anticipated concerns about the clinical relevance of OSCEs, highlighting the need for a more aligned assessment approach. Diverse perspectives on OSCE assessments reveal perceived helpfulness alongside challenges such as lack of feedback, examiner training, time constraints, and mental stress.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference30 articles.
1. Sader J, Cerutti B, Meynard L, Geoffroy F, Meister V, Paignon A, Junod Perron N. The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs. BMC Med Edu. 2022;14(1):1–0.
2. Gilani S, Pankhania K, Aruketty M, Naeem F, Alkhayyat A, Akhtar U, Chaudhary M, Sinha S. Twelve tips to organise a mock OSCE. Med Teach. 2022;6(1):26–31.
3. Mak V, Krishnan S, Chuang S. Students’ and examiners’ experiences of their first virtual pharmacy objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Healthcare. 2022;10(2):328–29.
4. Braier-Lorimer DA, Warren-Miell H. A peer-led mock OSCE improves student confidence for summative OSCE assessments in a traditional medical course. Med Teach. 2022;6(2):535–40.
5. Grover S, Pandya M, Ranasinghe C, Ramji SP, Bola H, Raj S. Assessing the utility of virtual OSCE sessions as an educational tool: a national pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;12(1):1–7.