Author:
Masini Irene,Rosecrance Katherine,Patibandla Yamini,Barker Margot,Cardall Jarvis Anna,Patel Jasmine
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Formal education surrounding abortion care during pre-clinical years of medical school is limited and will likely decrease with the overturning of Roe v. Wade. This study describes and evaluates the impact of an original abortion didactic session implemented during the pre-clinical years of medical school.
Methods
We implemented a didactic session at the University of California Irvine outlining abortion epidemiology, pregnancy options counseling, standard abortion care, and the current legislative landscape surrounding abortion. The preclinical session also included an interactive, small group case-based discussion. Pre-session and post-session surveys were obtained to evaluate changes in participants’ knowledge and attitudes and to collect feedback for future sessions.
Results
92 matched pre- and post-session surveys were completed and analyzed (response rate 77%). The majority of the respondents identified themselves as more “pro-choice” compared to “pro-life” on the pre-session survey. Results reflected significantly increased comfort discussing abortion care and significantly increased knowledge about abortion prevalence and techniques after the session. Qualitative feedback was overwhelmingly positive and reflected participants’ appreciation for the focus on the medical aspects of abortion care as opposed to an ethical discussion.
Conclusions
Abortion education targeted to preclinical medical students can be implemented effectively by a medical student cohort with institutional support.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Education,General Medicine
Reference14 articles.
1. Dobbs vs Jackson., 597 U.S. (2022)
2. Guttmacher Institute. 26 states are certain or likely to ban abortion without Roe: here’s which ones and why. Accessed November 23., 2021. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2021/10/26-states-are-certain-or-likely-ban-abortion-without-roe-heres-which-ones-and-why.
3. Guttmacher Institute. State bans on abortion throughout pregnancy. Accessed August 15., 2022. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/state-policies-later-abortions.
4. Vinekar KMD, Karlapudi MPH, Nathan ABS, Turk LMD, PhD JK, Rible MPA, Radhika MD. MSc; Steinauer, Jody MD, PhD projected implications of overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs, Obstet Gynecol: April 27, 2022 - Volume - Issue – 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832.
5. Traub AM, Mermin-Bunnell K, Pareek P, Williams S, Connell NB, Kawwass JF, Cwiak C. The implications of overturning Roe v. Wade on medical education and future physicians. Lancet Reg Health Am 2022 Jul 20;14:100334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2022.100334. PMID: 36777391; PMCID: PMC9904004.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献