Author:
Määttä Sylvia,Petersson Christina,Gäre Boel Andersson,Henriks Göran,Ånfors Henrik,Lundberg Christin,Nilsagård Ylva
Abstract
Abstract
Background
When the 21 Swedish county councils decided to collaborate in the creation of a national system for knowledge-based management, patient participation was mandatory. Patient and next-of-kin representatives (PR) co-produced person-centred and cohesive clinical pathways together with healthcare professionals (HPR). Research on co-production in healthcare at the national level is scarce. The aim of this study is to explore experiences of patient participation from the perspectives of both PRs and HPRs when co-producing clinical pathways within the Swedish nationwide healthcare system for knowledge-based management.
Methods
A qualitative study was conducted. A strategic sample of nine PRs and eight HPRs were interviewed individually between August 2022 and January 2023 using a semi-structured interview guide. We analysed data using an inductive content analysis.
Results
Three main categories were identified: (1) Finding appropriate patient representativeness; (2) Working methods that facilitate a patient perspective; and (3) Influence of the patient perspective in the clinical pathways.
Conclusions
The study demonstrates the importance of patient and next-of-kin participation in the construction of clinical pathways at the national level. The results provide a platform for further research on patient participation on the national level and add to studies on if and how patient participation on this level has an impact on how the clinical pathways are put into practice at the micro level, and the support provided at the meso level. The study contributes to the growing body of literature studying patient participation and co-production.
Trial registration
Region Örebro County ID 276,940. An advisory opinion was obtained from the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2021-05899-01).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference32 articles.
1. Elwyn G, Nelson E, Hager A, Price A. Coproduction: when users define quality. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020;29(9):711–6.
2. Holmes L, Cresswell K, Williams S, Parsons S, Keane A, Wilson C, et al. Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:30.
3. Lee-Foon NK, Smith M, Greene SM, Kuluski K, Reid RJ. Positioning patients to partner: exploring ways to better integrate patient involvement in the learning health systems. Res Involv Engagem. 2023;9(1):51.
4. Malterud K, Elvbakken KT. Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: a systematic review of outcomes and experiences. Scand J Public Health. 2020;48(6):617–28.
5. Batalden P. Getting more health from healthcare: quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction-an essay by Paul Batalden. BMJ. 2018;362(k:3617):4.