Interlaboratory Comparison of Branched GDGT Temperature and pH Proxies Using Soils and Lipid Extracts

Author:

De Jonge Cindy1ORCID,Peterse Francien2ORCID,Nierop Klaas G. J.2,Blattmann Thomas M.1ORCID,Alexandre Marcelo3,Ansanay‐Alex Salome4,Austin Thomas5ORCID,Babin Mathieu6,Bard Edouard7ORCID,Bauersachs Thorsten89ORCID,Blewett Jerome10,Boehman Brenna11ORCID,Castañeda Isla S.12,Chen Junhui13,Conti Martina L. G.14ORCID,Contreras Sergio15ORCID,Cordes Julia16,Davtian Nina17ORCID,van Dongen Bart18ORCID,Duncan Bella19,Elling Felix J.20ORCID,Galy Valier11ORCID,Gao Shaopeng21ORCID,Hefter Jens22ORCID,Hinrichs Kai‐Uwe16ORCID,Helling Mitchell R.23ORCID,Hoorweg Mariska2,Hopmans Ellen24ORCID,Hou Juzhi21ORCID,Huang Yongsong3ORCID,Huguet Arnaud25ORCID,Jia Guodong26,Karger Cornelia27,Keely Brendan J.14,Kusch Stephanie6ORCID,Li Hui26,Liang Jie21ORCID,Lipp Julius S.16,Liu Weiguo28ORCID,Lu Hongxuan28ORCID,Mangelsdorf Kai27ORCID,Manners Hayley29ORCID,Martinez Garcia Alfredo30ORCID,Menot Guillemette4ORCID,Mollenhauer Gesine22ORCID,Naafs B. David A.31ORCID,Naeher Sebastian5ORCID,O'Connor Lauren K.1832ORCID,Pearce Ethan M.14ORCID,Pearson Ann10ORCID,Rao Zhiguo33ORCID,Rodrigo‐Gámiz Marta34ORCID,Rosendahl Chris20,Rostek Frauke7,Bao Rui35ORCID,Sanyal Prasanta36ORCID,Schubotz Florence16ORCID,Scott Wesley37,Sen Rahul36,Sluijs Appy2ORCID,Smittenberg Rienk3839,Stefanescu Ioana40ORCID,Sun Jia31,Sutton Paul29ORCID,Tierney Jess41ORCID,Tejos Eduardo15ORCID,Villanueva Joan17ORCID,Wang Huanye28ORCID,Werne Josef38ORCID,Yamamoto Masanobu42ORCID,Yang Huan43ORCID,Zhou Aifeng44ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Geological Institute ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland

2. Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

3. Department of Earth and Planetary Science Brown University Providence RI USA

4. ENS de Lyon CNRS Univ Lyon 1 UMR 5276 LGL‐TPE Lyon France

5. GNS Science Lower Hutt New Zealand

6. ISMER—Institute of Marine Sciences University of Quebec Rimouski Rimouski QC Canada

7. Collège de France CEREGE Aix‐Marseille University CNRS IRD INRAE Aix‐en‐Provence France

8. Institute of Geosciences Kiel University Kiel Germany

9. Now at Institute of Organic Biogeochemistry in Geo‐Systems RWTH Aachen University Aachen Germany

10. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USA

11. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Woods Hole MA USA

12. Department of Earth, Geographic and Climate Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst MA USA

13. Key Laboratory of Marine Eco‐Environmental Science and Technology Marine Bioresource and Environment Research Center The First Institute of Oceanography Ministry of Natural Resources Qingdao China

14. Department of Chemistry University of York York UK

15. Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción Concepción Chile

16. MARUM University of Bremen Bremen Germany

17. Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ICTA‐UAB) Catalonia Spain

18. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Manchester Manchester UK

19. Antarctic Research Centre Victoria University of Wellington Wellington New Zealand

20. Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Isotope Research Kiel University Kiel Germany

21. Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China

22. Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven Germany

23. Department of Chemistry University of Wyoming Laramie WY USA

24. Netherlands Institute of Sea Research (NIOZ) 't Horntje The Netherlands

25. Sorbonne Université CNRS EPHE PSL UMR METIS Paris France

26. State Key Laboratory of Marine Geology Tongji University Shanghai China

27. GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Potsdam Germany

28. State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology Institute of Earth Environment Chinese Academy of Sciences Xi'an China

29. University of Plymouth Plymouth UK

30. Max Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany

31. School of Chemistry University of Bristol Bristol UK

32. Now at Department of Earth Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

33. Key Laboratory of Ecological and Environmental Change in Subtropical Zone College of Geographic Science Hunan Normal University Changsha China

34. Department of Stratigraphy and Paleontology University of Granada Granada Spain

35. Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology Ministry of Education Institute for Advanced Ocean Studies Ocean University of China Qingdao China

36. Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER) Kolkata Mohanpur India

37. Department of Geology and Environmental Sciences University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh PA USA

38. Department of Geological Sciences Stockholm University Stockholm Sweden

39. Now at Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland

40. Department of Geology and Geophysics University of Wyoming Laramie WY USA

41. Department of Geosciences University of Arizona Tucson AZ USA

42. Department of Earth System Science Hokkaido University Sapporo Japan

43. School of Geography and Information Engineering China University of Geosciences Wuhan China

44. MOE Key Laboratory of Western China's Environmental Systems Collaborative Innovation Centre for Arid Environments and Climate Change Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

Abstract

AbstractRatios of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGT), which are membrane lipids of bacteria and archaea, are at the base of several paleoenvironmental proxies. They are frequently applied to soils as well as lake‐ and marine sediments to generate records of past temperature and soil pH. To derive meaningful environmental information from these reconstructions, high analytical reproducibility is required. Based on submitted results by 39 laboratories from across the world, which employ a diverse range of analytical and quantification methods, we explored the reproducibility of brGDGT‐based proxies (MBT′5ME, IR, and #ringstetra) measured on four soil samples and four soil lipid extracts. Correct identification and integration of 5‐ and 6‐methyl brGDGTs is a prerequisite for the robust calculation of proxy values, but this can be challenging as indicated by the large inter‐interlaboratory variation. The exclusion of statistical outliers improves the reproducibility, where the remaining uncertainty translates into a temperature offset from median proxy values of 0.3–0.9°C and a pH offset of 0.05–0.3. There is no apparent systematic impact of the extraction method and sample preparation steps on the brGDGT ratios. Although reported GDGT concentrations are generally consistent within laboratories, they vary greatly between laboratories. This large variability in brGDGT quantification may relate to variations in ionization efficiency or specific mass spectrometer settings possibly impacting the response of brGDGTs masses relative to that of the internal standard used. While ratio values of GDGT are generally comparable, quantities can currently not be compared between laboratories.

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3