Palliative primary tumor resection in minimally symptomatic (asymptomatic) patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases versus chemotherapy alone: a metaanalysis

Author:

Alimova Iu. V.1ORCID,Shelygin Yu. A.2ORCID,Rybakov E. G.1ORCID,Alekseev M. V.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology

2. Ryzhikh National Medical Research Center of Coloproctology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Healthcare of Russia

Abstract

AIM: to evaluate outcomes (overall survival, rate of surgical intervention due to complications of first treatment, 30-day mortality rate) of palliative primary tumor resection (PTR) followed by chemotherapy and chemotherapy/ radiotherapy (chemo/RT) alone in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous unresectable metastases.MATERIALS AND METHODS: a meta-analysis based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted on PubMed and Cochrane database. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used as the treatment effect measure for comparing results. Combined overall effect measures were calculated for a random effect model. All analyses were performed using the Review Manager 5.3 software.RESULTS: eighteen non-randomized studies, including a total of 2,999 patients (1,737 PTR and 1,262 chemo/RT) were identified. Gender, age, site of primary tumor and distant metastasis of patients were comparable between groups in all analyzed studies. Two-year (38.2% vs. 21.1%; OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28–0.64; p < 0.0001) and 5-year (12.7% vs. 5.3%; OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21–0.97; p = 0.04) overall survival rates were significantly higher in the PTR group than in the chemo/RT group. No significant differences in 30-day mortality rate between the two groups (1.7% vs. 1%; OR 1.92; 95% CI 0.79–4.68; p = 0.15). However, the rate of surgical intervention due to complications of first treatment was significantly lower in the PTR group comparing to the chemo/RT group (2.3% vs. 14.53%; OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.08–0.40; p < 0.0001). At the same time, one hundred and fourteen patients (13.8%; OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.09–0.40; p < 0.0001) in the chemo/RT group required surgery for symptoms associated with a primary tumor.CONCLUSIONS: PTR in patients with asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic CRC and synchronous unresectable metastases significantly improves overall survival, allows to prevent surgical intervention due to complications related to primary tumor and is not associated with increased postoperative mortality rate comparing to systemic chemotherapy/radiotherapy as a treatment of first line. The current data are based on non-randomized comparative studies and data from early terminated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and further well-designed RCTs are required.

Publisher

Russian Association of Coloproctology

Subject

Gastroenterology,Oncology,Surgery

Reference54 articles.

1. Cronin KA, Lake AJ, Scott S, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics. Cancer. 2018;124(13):2785–800. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31551

2. Cook AD, Single R, McCahill LE. Surgical resection of primary tumors in patients who present with stage IV colorectal cancer: an analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data, 1988 to 2000. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005;12(8):637–45. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2005.06.012

3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Plymouth Meeting, PA: NCCN; Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): colon cancer [Internet] c2021 [cited 2021 Jan 21]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf

4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Plymouth Meeting, PA: NCCN; Clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines): rectal cancer [Internet] c2021 [cited 2020 Dec 22]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf

5. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, et al. Committee, Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(suppl 4):iv22–40. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3